Trial reportAmerican journal of ophthalmology2022
Three-Year Safety Results of SAR422459 (EIAV-ABCA4) Gene Therapy in Patients With ABCA4-Associated Stargardt Disease: An Open-Label Dose-Escalation Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial, Cohorts 1-5.
Trial report in American journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Genetic therapies for Stargardt disease].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Precision Medicine in Inherited Retinal Disease: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Keeping a PROMise: embedding patient voices in ophthalmic outcomes.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Expert Consensus on Characteristics, Etiology, and Management of Chorioretinal Atrophy in Patients Treated with Voretigene Neparvovec.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Designs of the clinical trials aiming at evaluating cell and gene therapy products: A critical appraisal from a literature review.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Review
- Gene Therapy for Inherited Retinal Disease: Current Strategies, Personalized Medicine, and Future Implications-A Comprehensive Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Mechanisms and Functions of Chromophore Regeneration in the Classical Visual Cycle: Implications for Retinal Disease Pathogenesis and Therapy.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Visual Neurorestoration: An Expert Review of Current Strategies for Restoring Vision in Humans.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Addressing Challenges in Developing Treatments for Inherited Retinal Diseases: Recommendations From the Third Monaciano Symposium.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Review
- The Era of Gene Therapy: The Advancement of Lentiviral Vectors and Their Pseudotyping.Viruses · 2025Review
- Advancing Insights into Pediatric Macular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- "Seeing Stars": The Gene Therapy Revolution.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Emerging Therapeutic Approaches and Genetic Insights in Stargardt Disease: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Gene therapy for ultrarare diseases: a geneticist's perspective.Journal of biomedical science · 2024Review
- A Retrospective Longitudinal Study of 460 Patients with ABCA4-Associated Retinal Disease.Ophthalmology · 2024Article
- PHLDA1-PRDM1 mediates the effect of lentiviral vectors on fate-determination of human retinal progenitor cells.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024Article
- Review
- Stargardt macular dystrophy and therapeutic approaches.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Seeing the Future: A Review of Ocular Therapy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Beyond Vision: An Overview of Regenerative Medicine and Its Current Applications in Ophthalmological Care.Cells · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo report on the safety of the first 5 cohorts of a gene therapy trial using recombinant equine infectious anemia virus expressing ABCA4 (EIAV-ABCA4) in adults with Stargardt dystrophy due to mutations in ABCA4.
designNonrandomized multicenter phase I/IIa clinical trial.
methodsPatients received a subretinal injection of EIAVABCA4 in the worse-seeing eye at 3 dose levels and were followed for 3 years after treatment.
main outcome measuresThe primary end point was ocular and systemic adverse events. The secondary end points were best-corrected visual acuity, static perimetry, kinetic perimetry, total field hill of vision, full field electroretinogram, multifocal ERG, color fundus photography, short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography.
resultsThe subretinal injections were well tolerated by all 22 patients across 3 dose levels. There was 1 case of a treatment-related ophthalmic serious adverse event in the form of chronic ocular hypertension. The most common adverse events were associated with the surgical procedure. In 1 patient treated with the highest dose, there was a significant decline in the number of macular flecks as compared with the untreated eye. However, in 6 patients, hypoautofluorescent changes were worse in the treated eye than in the untreated eye. Of these, 1 patient had retinal pigment epithelium atrophy that was characteristic of tissue damage likely associated with bleb induction. No patients had any clinically significant changes in best-corrected visual acuity, static perimetry, kinetic perimetry, total field hill of vision, full field electroretinogram, or multifocal ERG attributable to the treatment.
conclusionsSubretinal treatment with EIAV-ABCA4 was well tolerated with only 1 case of ocular hypertension. No clinically significant changes in visual function tests were found to be attributable to the treatment. However, 27% of treated eyes showed exacerbation of retinal pigment epithelium atrophy on fundus autofluorescence. There was a significant reduction in macular flecks in 1 treated eye from the highest dose cohort. Additional follow-up and continued investigation in more patients will be required to fully characterize the safety and efficacy of EIAV-ABCA4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.