Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35248420›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

Evidence of suboptimal maternal vaccination coverage in pregnant New Zealand women and increasing inequity over time: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.

Leah Pointon, Anna S Howe, Matthew Hobbs, Janine Paynter, Natalie Gauld, Nikki Turner, Esther Willing

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leah PointonDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Anna S HoweSchool of Health Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand; Immunisation Advisory Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand. Electronic address: a.howe@auckland.ac.nz.
Matthew HobbsSchool of Health Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand; GeoHealth Laboratory, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.
Janine PaynterDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Natalie GauldDepartment of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand; School of Pharmacy, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nikki TurnerDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Immunisation Advisory Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Esther WillingKōhatu - Centre for Hauora Māori, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZUniversity of Canterbury · NZUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdequate maternal vaccination coverage is critical for the prevention and control of infectious disease outbreaks such as pertussis, influenza, and more recently COVID-19. To guide efforts to increase vaccination coverage this study examined the extent of vaccination coverage in pregnant New Zealand women over time by area-level deprivation and ethnicity.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was used consisting of all pregnant women who delivered between 01 January 2013 and 31 December 2018, using administrative health datasets. Outcomes were defined as receipt of influenza or pertussis vaccination in any one of the relevant data sources (National Immunisation Register, Proclaims, or Pharmaceutical collection) during their eligible pregnancy. Ethnicity was prioritised as Māori (NZ indigenous), Pacific, Asian, and Other or NZ European and deprivation was defined using New Zealand Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD).

resultsBetween 2013 and 2018, Asian women had the highest maternal vaccination coverage (36%) for pertussis, while Māori and Pacific women had the lowest, 13% and 15% respectively. Coverage of pertussis vaccination during pregnancy in low deprivation Māori women was 24% and 28% in Pacific women. This is in comparison to 30% and 25% in high deprivation Asian and European/Other women, respectively. Similar trends were seen for influenza.

conclusionBetween 2013 and 2018 maternal vaccination coverage increased for pertussis and influenza. Despite this coverage remains suboptimal, and existing ethnic and deprivation inequities increased. There is an urgent need to focus on equity, to engage and support ethic communities by creating genuinely accessible, culturally appropriate health services.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza VaccinesFemaleHumansNew ZealandPregnancyPregnant PeopleRetrospective StudiesVaccinationVaccination CoverageInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35248420
PMCPMC9352189
OpenAlexW4214909039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.