Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35248123›Full record

Trial reportTrials2022

Non-inferiority test for a continuous variable with a flexible margin in an active controlled trial: an application to the "Stratall ANRS 12110 / ESTHER" trial.

Arsene Brunelle Sandie, Nicolas Molinari, Anthony Wanjoya, Charles Kouanfack, Christian Laurent, Jules Brice Tchatchueng-Mbougua

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00301561 (Expanded Access to Antiretroviral Therapy in Africa), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00301561 phase3completednot on this map

Expanded Access to Antiretroviral Therapy in Africa: Assessment of the Patients' Management in District Hospitals With a Simplified Follow-up Approach (ANRS 12110 STRATALL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFrench National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral HepatitisRan2006 to 2010Enrolled459ConditionsHIV Infections, AIDSArmsSimplified follow-up approach of ARV treatment, Standard follow-up approach of ARV treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arsene Brunelle SandieAfrican Population and Health Research Center - West Africa Regional Office, Dakar, Senegal. sandiearse@gmail.com.
Nicolas MolinariIMAG,CNRS, Université Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Anthony WanjoyaDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), Nairobi, Kenya.
Charles KouanfackDay Hospital, Yaounde Central Hospital, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Christian LaurentIRD, INSERM, Université Montpellier, TransVIHMI, Montpellier, France.
Jules Brice Tchatchueng-MbouguaAfrican Population and Health Research Center - West Africa Regional Office, Dakar, Senegal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-inferiority trials are becoming increasingly popular in public health and clinical research. The choice of the non-inferiority margin is the cornerstone of such trials. Most of the time, the non-inferiority margin is fixed and constant, determined from historical trials as a fraction of the effect of the reference intervention. But in some circumstances, there may some uncertainty around the reference treatment that one would like to account for when performing the hypothesis testing. In this case, the non-inferiority margin is not fixed in advance and depends on the reference intervention estimate. Hence, the uncertainty surrounding the non-inferiority margin should be accounted for in statistical tests. In this work, we explore how to perform the non-inferiority test for a continuous variable with a flexible margin.

methodsWe have proposed in this study, two procedures for the non-inferiority test with a flexible margin for continuous endpoints. The proposed test procedures are based on a test statistic and confidence interval approaches respectively. Simulations have been used to assess the performances and properties of the proposed test procedures. An application was done on a real-world clinical data, to assess the efficacy of clinical monitoring alone versus laboratory and clinical monitoring in HIV-infected adult patients.

resultsBasically, for both proposed methods, the type I error estimate was not dependent on the values of the reference treatment. In the test statistic approach, the type 1 error rate estimate was approximatively equal to the nominal value. It has been found that the confidence interval level determined approximatively the level of significance. For a given nominal type I error α, the appropriate one- and two-sided confidence intervals should be with levels 1-α and 1-2α, respectively.

conclusionsBased on the type I error rate and power estimates, the proposed non-inferiority hypothesis test procedures had good performances and were applicable in practice.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00301561. Registered on March 13, 2006, url: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00301561 .

Indexed as

Margins of ExcisionResearch DesignAdultHumansActive controlled trialAsymptotic testConfidence intervalFlexible marginNon-inferiority

Identifiers

PMID35248123
PMCPMC8898539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.