Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35248115›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2022

Hybrid high-definition microvessel imaging/shear wave elastography improves breast lesion characterization.

Juanjuan Gu, Redouane Ternifi, Nicholas B Larson, Jodi M Carter, Judy C Boughey, Daniela L Stan, Robert T Fazzio, Mostafa Fatemi, Azra Alizad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-Mass Breast Lesions or General Malignancy Features?Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juanjuan Gu *Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Redouane Ternifi *Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Nicholas B LarsonDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Jodi M CarterDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Judy C BougheyDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Daniela L StanDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Robert T FazzioDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Mostafa Fatemi *Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Azra Alizad *Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Alizad.azra@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7658-1572
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Lila J. Rutten · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Using Label-free Ultrasound Angio-Morphometry Analysis for Improving Ultrasound Specificity in Breast Cancer Detection and Treatment MonitoringR01CA239548 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ALIZAD, AZRA, FATEMI, MOSTAFA · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
Multi-parameter Nonlinear Elasticity Mapping of Breast MassesR01CA195527 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ALIZAD, AZRA, FATEMI, MOSTAFA · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
Classification of breast masses based on visco-elastic propertiesR01CA168575 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI FATEMI, MOSTAFA, INSANA, MICHAEL F · 2013 to 2018
$2.5M
Combined Acoustic Imaging and Viscoelastic Parameters Estimation in Breast CancerR01CA148994 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ALIZAD, AZRA · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS R01 CA148994NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168575NCI NIH HHS R01 CA195527NCI NIH HHS R01 CA239548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow specificity in current breast imaging modalities leads to increased unnecessary follow-ups and biopsies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of combining the quantitative parameters of high-definition microvasculature imaging (HDMI) and 2D shear wave elastography (SWE) with clinical factors (lesion depth and age) for improving breast lesion differentiation.

methodsIn this prospective study, from June 2016 through April 2021, patients with breast lesions identified on diagnostic ultrasound and recommended for core needle biopsy were recruited. HDMI and SWE were conducted prior to biopsies. Two new HDMI parameters, Murray's deviation and bifurcation angle, and a new SWE parameter, mass characteristic frequency, were included for quantitative analysis. Lesion malignancy prediction models based on HDMI only, SWE only, the combination of HDMI and SWE, and the combination of HDMI, SWE and clinical factors were trained via elastic net logistic regression with 70% (360/514) randomly selected data and validated with the remaining 30% (154/514) data. Prediction performances in the validation test set were compared across models with respect to area under the ROC curve as well as sensitivity and specificity based on optimized threshold selection.

resultsA total of 508 participants (mean age, 54 years ± 15), including 507 female participants and 1 male participant, with 514 suspicious breast lesions (range, 4-72 mm, median size, 13 mm) were included. Of the lesions, 204 were malignant. The SWE-HDMI prediction model, combining quantitative parameters from SWE and HDMI, with AUC of 0.973 (95% CI 0.95-0.99), was significantly higher than the result predicted with the SWE model or HDMI model alone. With an optimal cutoff of 0.25 for the malignancy probability, the sensitivity and specificity were 95.5% and 89.7%, respectively. The specificity was further improved with the addition of clinical factors. The corresponding model defined as the SWE-HDMI-C prediction model had an AUC of 0.981 (95% CI 0.96-1.00).

conclusionsThe SWE-HDMI-C detection model, a combination of SWE estimates, HDMI quantitative biomarkers and clinical factors, greatly improved the accuracy in breast lesion characterization.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsElasticity Imaging TechniquesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMicrovesselsMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography, MammaryBreast cancer diagnosisClinical factorsHybrid high-definition microvessel imagingImproved diagnosis accuracyShear wave elastographySWE-HDMI-C detection model

Identifiers

PMID35248115
PMCPMC8898476
OpenAlexW4220695711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.