Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35248111›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2022

Self-perceived preparedness and training needs of healthcare personnel on humanitarian mission: a pre- and post-deployment survey.

Frederike J C Haverkamp, Tristan A J van Leest, Måns Muhrbeck, Rigo Hoencamp, Andreas Wladis, Edward C T H Tan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Psychological, personal, and professional development needs of military mental health clinicians: Identifying implications for wellbeing and best practice utilizing the Delphi method.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Frederike J C HaverkampDepartment of Surgery, Radboudumc, Internal Postal Code 618, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Frederike.haverkamp@radboudumc.nl.
Tristan A J van LeestDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Måns MuhrbeckDepartment of Surgery in Norrköping, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences and Center for Disaster Medicine and Traumatology, Linköping University, 603 79, Norrköping, Sweden.
Rigo HoencampDefence Healthcare Organization, Ministry of Defence, Herculeslaan 1, 3584 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Andreas WladisDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences and Center for Disaster Medicine and Traumatology, Linköping University, 583 30, Linköping, Sweden.
Edward C T H TanDepartment of Surgery, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Linköping University · SERadboud University Nijmegen · NLErasmus MC · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHumanitarian healthcare workers are indispensable for treating weapon-wounded patients in armed conflict, and the international humanitarian community should ensure adequate preparedness for this task. This study aims to assess deployed humanitarian healthcare workers' self-perceived preparedness, training requirements and mental support needs.

methodsMedical professionals deployed with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) between October 2018 and June 2020 were invited to participate in this longitudinal questionnaire. Two separate questionnaires were conducted pre- and post-deployment to assess respondents' self-perceived preparedness, preparation efforts, deployment experiences and deployment influence on personal and professional development.

resultsResponse rates for the pre- and post-deployment questionnaires were 52.5% (114/217) and 26.7% (58/217), respectively. Eighty-five respondents (85/114; 74.6%) reported feeling sufficiently prepared to treat adult trauma patients, reflected by predeployment ratings of 3 or higher on a scale from 1 (low) to 5 (high). Significantly lower ratings were found among nurses compared to physicians. Work experience in a high-volume trauma centre before deployment was associated with a greater feeling of preparedness (mean rank 46.98 vs. 36.89; p = 0.045). Topics most frequently requested to be included in future training were neurosurgery, maxillofacial surgery, reconstructive surgery, ultrasound, tropical diseases, triage, burns and newborn noncommunicable disease management. Moreover, 51.7% (30/58) of the respondents regarded the availability of a mental health professional during deployment as helpful to deal with stress.

conclusionOverall, deployed ICRC medical personnel felt sufficiently prepared for their missions, although nurses reported lower preparedness levels than physicians. Recommendations were made concerning topics to be covered in future training and additional preparation strategies to gain relevant clinical experience. Future preparatory efforts should focus on all medical professions, and their training needs should be continuously monitored to ensure the alignment of preparation strategies with preparation needs.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelRed CrossAdultDelivery of Health CareHumansInfant, NewbornSurveys and QuestionnairesDeployment; humanitarian aid; mission; training; preparedness; armed conflict

Identifiers

PMID35248111
PMCPMC8898429
OpenAlexW4220984893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.