Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35248048›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2022

Chlorhexidine gluconate enhances the remineralization effect of high viscosity glass ionomer cement on dentin carious lesions in vitro.

Patcharanun Borompiyasawat, Boonsong Putraphan, Sureerat Luangworakhun, Waleerat Sukarawan, Oranuch Techatharatip

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patcharanun BorompiyasawatDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Boonsong PutraphanOral Biology Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, 34 Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Sureerat LuangworakhunOral Biology Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, 34 Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Waleerat SukarawanDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, 34 Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. waleerat.s@chula.ac.th.
Oranuch TechatharatipDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, 34 Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. oranuch.te@chula.ac.th.
Chulalongkorn University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare the mean mineral density (MMD) and examine the remineralization of carious dentin after cavity disinfection with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) and restoration with high viscosity glass ionomer cement (H-GIC) in vitro.

methodsSelective caries removal to leathery dentin was performed in 40 extracted primary molars. The samples were scanned using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to determine the MMD baseline and randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 10): Equia™ group, applied dentin conditioner and restored with H-GIC (Equia Forte™), CHX-Equia™ group, disinfected the cavity with 2% CHX before applying dentin conditioner and restored with H-GIC (Equia Forte™), Ketac™ group, restored with H-GIC (Ketac Universal™) and CHX-Ketac™ group, disinfected the cavity with 2% CHX before restored with H-GIC (Ketac Universal™). The samples underwent micro-CT scanning post-restoration and post-pH-cycling to determine their respective MMDs. One sample from each group was randomly selected to analyze by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

resultsThe MMD gain in the 4 groups post-restoration was significantly different between the Equia™ and CHX-Ketac™ groups (oneway ANOVA with Post hoc (Tukey) test, P = 0.045). There was a significant difference in MMD gain post-restoration between the Equia™ and CHX-Equia™ groups (Independent t-test, P = 0.046). However, the Ketac™ and CHX-Ketac™ group's MMD were similar. The SEM images revealed that the CHX-Ketac™ group had the smallest dentinal tubule orifices and the thickest intertubular dentin among the groups. However, the CHX-Equia™ group had thicker intertubular dentin than the Equia™ group.

conclusionApplying 2% CHX on demineralized dentin enhances the remineralization of the dentin beneath the restoration.

Indexed as

Dental CariesGlass Ionomer CementsChlorhexidineDentinHumansViscosityX-Ray MicrotomographyChlorhexidinechlorhexidine gluconateGlass Ionomer CementsAtraumatic restorative treatmentCavity disinfectantChlorhexidineDental cariesGlass ionomer cementMean mineral densityMicro computed tomographyPrimary teethRemineralization

Identifiers

PMID35248048
PMCPMC8898514
OpenAlexW4221051122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.