Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35247904›Full record

SynthesisCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2022

Adult-Attained Height and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Cohort Study, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis.

Elinor Zhou, Lin Wang, Celina N Santiago, Julie Nanavati, Samara Rifkin, Emma Spence, Linda M Hylind, Joell J Gills, Louis La Luna, David R Kafonek and 6 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: A review with special emphasis on India.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Elinor Zhou *Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lin Wang *Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Celina N SantiagoJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Julie NanavatiJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Samara RifkinDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Emma SpenceJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Linda M HylindDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-0963-6596
Joell J GillsJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Louis La LunaDigestive Disease Associates, Ltd, Wyomissing, Pennsylvania.
David R KafonekDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology at Green Spring Station Endoscopy Center, Johns Hopkins Health Care & Surgery Center, Lutherville, Maryland.
David M CromwellDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology at Green Spring Station Endoscopy Center, Johns Hopkins Health Care & Surgery Center, Lutherville, Maryland.
Julia L DrewesDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-5060-0624
Cynthia L SearsDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-4059-1661
Francis M GiardielloDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Gerard E MullinDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-5317-6788
Biofilm Study Consortium

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
BASIC SCIENCE RESEARCH IN DIGESTIVE DISEASEST32DK007632 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DONOWITZ, MARK · 1989 to 2018
$5.4M
Biofilm Epidemiology and Mechanisms in Colon CancerR01CA196845 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GIARDIELLO, FRANCIS M, SEARS, CYNTHIA · 2016 to 2020
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196845NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe influence of anthropometric characteristics on colorectal neoplasia biology is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if adult-attained height is independently associated with the risk of colorectal cancer or adenoma.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to August 2020 for studies on the association between adult-attained height and colorectal cancer or adenoma. The original data from the Johns Hopkins (Baltimore, MD) Colon Biofilm study was also included. The overall HR/OR of colorectal cancer/adenoma with increased height was estimated using random-effects meta-analysis.

resultsWe included 47 observational studies involving 280,644 colorectal cancer and 14,139 colorectal adenoma cases. Thirty-three studies reported data for colorectal cancer incidence per 10-cm increase in height; 19 yielded an HR of 1.14 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11-1.17; P < 0.001), and 14 engendered an OR of 1.09 (95% CI, 1.05-1.13; P < 0.001). Twenty-six studies compared colorectal cancer incidence between individuals within the highest versus the lowest height percentile; 19 indicated an HR of 1.24 (95% CI, 1.19-1.30; P < 0.001), and seven resulting in an OR of 1.07 (95% CI, 0.92-1.25; P = 0.39). Four studies reported data for assessing colorectal adenoma incidence per 10-cm increase in height, showing an overall OR of 1.06 (95% CI, 1.00-1.12; P = 0.03).

conclusionsGreater adult attained height is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma. IMPACT: Height should be considered as a risk factor for colorectal cancer screening.

Indexed as

AdenomaColorectal NeoplasmsAdultCohort StudiesHumansIncidenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35247904
PMCPMC8983463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.