ArticleESMO open2022
Artificial intelligence for detection of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer-a multicentric analysis of a pre-screening tool for clinical application.
Article in ESMO open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Molecular Biomarker Identification in Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Mutation enrichment in targeted panels flags immunotherapy-responsive POLE-driven hypermutated microsatellite-stable colorectal cancers.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and oral microbiome: Reshaping the diagnostic and therapeutic paradigm of OSCC.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Clinicopathological and molecular profiling of sporadic synchronous multiple primary colorectal cancers: focus on microsatellite instability status.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- What practicing pathologists and oncologists should know about the new computational pathology-based companion diagnostic tools.The Journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Comparison of immunohistochemistry, PCR, and NGS for the evaluation of mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.Diagnostic pathology · 2026Article
- The role of AI in oncology: present applications and future horizons.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence predictsVeterinary pathology · 2026Article
- Insights into artificial intelligence-based digital pathology in hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- H&E-based MSI/MMR testing with AI in colorectal cancer: a multi-centred blinded evaluation.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- AI-based neoadjuvant immunotherapy response prediction across pan-cancer: a comprehensive review.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Aligning computational pathology with clinical practice for colorectal cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Review
- Deepath-MSI: a clinic-ready deep learning model for microsatellite instability detection in colorectal cancer using whole-slide imaging.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Predictive model for sphincter preservation in lower rectal cancer.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-based digital pathology using H&E-stained whole slide images in immuno-oncology: from immune biomarker detection to immunotherapy response prediction.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Review
- Predicting ROS1 and ALK fusions in NSCLC from H&E slides with a two-step vision transformer approach.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of deep learning for MSI-H in colorectal cancer whole slide images.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Deep Gaussian process with uncertainty estimation for microsatellite instability and immunotherapy response prediction from histology.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The Role of Proteomics and Genomics in the Development of Colorectal Cancer Diagnostic Tools and Potential New Treatments.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence can be trained to predictVeterinary pathology · 2025Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicrosatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a key genetic feature which should be tested in every patient with colorectal cancer (CRC) according to medical guidelines. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods can detect MSI/dMMR directly in routine pathology slides, but the test performance has not been systematically investigated with predefined test thresholds.
methodWe trained and validated AI-based MSI/dMMR detectors and evaluated predefined performance metrics using nine patient cohorts of 8343 patients across different countries and ethnicities.
resultsClassifiers achieved clinical-grade performance, yielding an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of up to 0.96 without using any manual annotations. Subsequently, we show that the AI system can be applied as a rule-out test: by using cohort-specific thresholds, on average 52.73% of tumors in each surgical cohort [total number of MSI/dMMR = 1020, microsatellite stable (MSS)/ proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) = 7323 patients] could be identified as MSS/pMMR with a fixed sensitivity at 95%. In an additional cohort of N = 1530 (MSI/dMMR = 211, MSS/pMMR = 1319) endoscopy biopsy samples, the system achieved an AUROC of 0.89, and the cohort-specific threshold ruled out 44.12% of tumors with a fixed sensitivity at 95%. As a more robust alternative to cohort-specific thresholds, we showed that with a fixed threshold of 0.25 for all the cohorts, we can rule-out 25.51% in surgical specimens and 6.10% in biopsies.
interpretationWhen applied in a clinical setting, this means that the AI system can rule out MSI/dMMR in a quarter (with global thresholds) or half of all CRC patients (with local fine-tuning), thereby reducing cost and turnaround time for molecular profiling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.