Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35247868›Full record

ArticleBody image2022

Measurement invariance of body image measures by age, gender, sexual orientation, race, weight status, and age: The U.S. Body Project I.

Vivienne M Hazzard, Lauren M Schaefer, J Kevin Thompson, Stuart B Murray, David A Frederick

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Body image, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Measurement Invariance across Sexual Orientation for Measures of Sexual Attitudes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vivienne M HazzardSanford Center for Bio-behavioral Research, Fargo, ND, USA. Electronic address: viviennehazzard@gmail.com.
Lauren M SchaeferSanford Center for Bio-behavioral Research, Fargo, ND, USA.
J Kevin ThompsonDepartment of Psychology, University of South Florida, FL, USA.
Stuart B MurrayDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
David A FrederickCrean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA. Electronic address: enderflies1@aol.com.
Sanford Research · USChapman University · USUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

The Neurocognitive Reward Learning Mechanisms of Binge EatingP20GM134969 · NIGMS · SANFORD RESEARCH NORTH · PI DODD, DORIAN R · 2021 to 2025
$11.5M
Regional Postdoctoral Training Grant in Eating Disorders ResearchT32MH082761 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CAROL B. PETERSON · 2009 to 2026
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM134969NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH082761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite growing interest in comparing body image experiences across diverse groups, limited work has examined whether body image measures operate similarly across different populations, raising important questions about the appropriateness of comparing scale means across demographic groups. This study employed measurement invariance testing to evaluate whether such comparisons are appropriate with existing body image measures. Specifically, multi-group confirmatory factor analysis was conducted using a community sample of 11,620 men and women to test increasing levels of invariance (configural, metric, scalar) across five key demographic variables (age group, gender, sexual orientation, race, weight status) for five commonly used body image measures (the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4, the Body Surveillance subscale of the Objectified Body Consciousness Scale, the Appearance Evaluation and Overweight Preoccupation subscales of the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire, and the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory). Results provided evidence of scalar (i.e., strong) invariance for all five measures across age, gender, sexual orientation, race, and weight status groups, indicating that the latent factors captured by these measures have the same meaning across demographic groups. Findings therefore support the comparison of scale/subscale means across multiple demographic groups for these body image measures.

Indexed as

Body ImageQuality of LifeFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesBody ImageBody Mass IndexGenderPsychometricsRaceSexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID35247868
PMCPMC9167237
OpenAlexW4214854367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.