Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35247867›Full record

ArticleBody image2022

Pathways from sociocultural and objectification constructs to body satisfaction among men: The U.S. Body Project I.

David A Frederick, Tracy L Tylka, Rachel F Rodgers, Lexie Convertino, Jamie-Lee Pennesi, Michael C Parent, Tiffany A Brown, Emilio J Compte, Catherine P Cook-Cottone, Canice E Crerand and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Body image, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

David A FrederickCrean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA. Electronic address: dfrederi@chapman.edu.
Tracy L TylkaDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. Electronic address: tylka.2@osu.edu.
Rachel F RodgersAPPEAR, Department of Applied Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Lexie ConvertinoSan Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jamie-Lee PennesiDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Michael C ParentDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Tiffany A BrownDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Emilio J CompteSchool of Psychology, Adolfo Ibáñez University, Santiago, Chile; Research Department, Comenzar de Nuevo Treatment Center, Monterrey, Mexico.
Catherine P Cook-CottoneDepartment of Counseling, School, and Educational Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Canice E CrerandDepartment of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Vanessa L MalcarneDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jason M NagataDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Marisol PerezDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Eva PilaSchool of Kinesiology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Lauren M SchaeferSanford Center for Bio-behavioral Research, Fargo, ND, USA.
J Kevin ThompsonDepartment of Psychology, University of South Florida, FL, USA.
Stuart B MurrayDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

The Neurocognitive Reward Learning Mechanisms of Binge EatingP20GM134969 · NIGMS · SANFORD RESEARCH NORTH · PI WONDERLICH, STEPHEN ARTHUR · 2021 to 2025
$11.5M
Regional Postdoctoral Training Grant in Eating Disorders ResearchT32MH082761 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CAROL B. PETERSON · 2009 to 2026
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM134969NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH082761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the tripartite influence model, body dissatisfaction is shaped by internalizing cultural appearance ideals stemming from appearance-related family, peer, and media pressures. This model was developed for women, but emerging evidence points to its relevance for men's body image. This study advanced this budding research by (a) integrating muscular-ideal internalization alongside lean-ideal internalization and body surveillance into the model, (b) examining two positive dimensions of body image as outcomes (body image quality of life and appearance evaluation), and (c) testing this model in national online sample of 5293 men. Structural equation modeling supported the model. Family, peer, and media pressures related to higher lean-ideal internalization, which related to higher body surveillance and poorer body image outcomes. Peer and media pressures related to higher muscular-ideal internalization, which related to higher body surveillance but more adaptive body image outcomes. We further examined whether model variables and paths differed based on men's body mass index (BMI). Men with higher BMIs evidenced a stronger path between body surveillance and body image outcomes. These findings highlight the usefulness of sociocultural models for understanding men's body image experiences.

Indexed as

Body ImagePersonal SatisfactionFemaleHumansMaleMenPeer GroupQuality of LifeAppearance evaluationBody image quality of lifeBody mass indexMenObjectification theoryTripartite influence model

Identifiers

PMID35247867
PMCPMC9812655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.