Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35247190›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2022

Communicating the diagnosis of Klinefelter syndrome to children and adolescents: when, how, and who?

L Aliberti, I Gagliardi, S Bigoni, S Lupo, S Caracciolo, A Ferlini, A M Isidori, M C Zatelli, M R Ambrosio

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L AlibertiDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9261-8593
I GagliardiDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3280-8592
S BigoniUnit of Medical Genetics, S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0336-7097
S LupoEndocrine Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Ferrara, Cona/Ferrara, Italy.
S CaraccioloNeurological, Psychiatric and Psychological Sciences Sections, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
A FerliniUnit of Medical Genetics, S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8385-9870
A M IsidoriDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9037-5417
M C ZatelliDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8408-7796
M R AmbrosioDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. mbrmrs@unife.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7911-9770
University of Ferrara · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Klinefelter syndrome (KS) is the most frequent sex chromosome aneuploidy in males. KS diagnosis disclosure has an important impact on diagnosis acceptance and the increase in prenatal diagnostic procedures raises questions regarding communication to children/adolescents. Limited data are currently available on this issue. The aim of the study was to investigate aspects like the best timing (when), topics (how), and healthcare professional (who), which, in the opinion of both KS patients and parents, may be considered the best for diagnosis communication to KS children/adolescents. We also analyzed how participants received the communication in real life and evaluated the differences between the responses given by parents who receive KS diagnosis before or after KS patient birth regarding disclosure of KS communication. KS adult patients, KS mothers, and KS fathers, not belonging to the same family, completed a questionnaire containing quantitative measures (5 points Likert scale), open-ended questions, and multiple choice questions. Parental responses were divided according to the timing at which the communication occurred: prenatal age diagnosis (PRE-D) or postnatal age diagnosis (POST-D). A total of 41 KS adults and 77 KS parents (53 PRE-D, 24 POST-D) were recruited. Most KS patients and most POST-D parents consider that communication should be provided before 14 years of age; most PRE-D parents consider 14-18 years of age the best period for communication. We suggest that communication should occur preferably before 18 years of age by a multidisciplinary team (endocrinologists, psychologists, geneticists, and parents) and that the information should deal not only fertility and hormonal aspects but also metabolic and cognitive features.

Indexed as

AdolescentsCommunicationDisclosureKlinefelter syndromeMultidisciplinaryParents

Identifiers

PMID35247190
PMCPMC9270507
OpenAlexW4220752671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.