Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35247181›Full record

SynthesisClinical journal of gastroenterology2022

Greater than or equal to 8 mm is a safe diameter of common bile duct for primary duct closure: single-arm meta-analysis and systematic review.

Manjun Deng, Jingxin Yan, Zheheng Zhang, Zhixin Wang, Lingqiang Zhang, Li Ren, Haining Fan

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manjun Deng *Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Tongren Road 27, Xining, 810001, Qinghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5251-1836
Jingxin Yan *Department of Interventional Therapy, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, 810001, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2734-6146
Zheheng ZhangDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Tongren Road 27, Xining, 810001, Qinghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4305-0721
Zhixin WangDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Tongren Road 27, Xining, 810001, Qinghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7222-7069
Lingqiang ZhangDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Tongren Road 27, Xining, 810001, Qinghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1148-101X
Li RenDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Tongren Road 27, Xining, 810001, Qinghai, People's Republic of China. renli_xn@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7121-3992
Haining FanDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Tongren Road 27, Xining, 810001, Qinghai, People's Republic of China. fanhaining@medmail.com.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5313-5732
Qinghai University · CN

Funding

General Project of Qinghai Provincial Health Commission 2018-wjzdx-118Project of Science and Technology Department of Qinghai Province 2020-ZJ-Y01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Greater than or equal to 8 mm was often used as the safe diameter of primary duct closure (PDC) after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in previous studies, but it is impossible to verify the source of this safe diameter, and lack of evidence for the safe diameter of PDC. Hence, this study evaluates the incidence of postoperative complications by single-arm meta-analysis to demonstrate the feasibility of using 8 mm as the safe diameter of PDC, so as to provide reference for clinical selection. Eligible studies were searched by MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science from January 1995 to May 2021, investigating eligible literature using PDC after LCBDE for methods of common bile duct closure. The single-arm meta-analysis was analyzed by "meta" package under R 4.0.5, and the pooled incidence of postoperative complications was calculated. Twelve literatures were enrolled in this single-arm meta-analysis including 792 patients. The pooled complications rate including total complications (13.1%, 95% CI 10.1-15.6%), total biliary duct-related complications (9.4%, 95% CI 7.4-11.6%), residual stones (1.3%, 95% CI 0.3-2.7%), bile leakage (5.1%, 95% CI 3.5-6.9%), postoperative pneumonia (2.1%, 95% CI 0.8-3.8%), postoperative acute pancreatitis (1.8%, 95% CI 0.2-4.3%), and stone recurrence (2.6%, 95% CI 1.1-4.4%). The clinical indication of PDC after LCBDE should follow that the diameter of common bile duct ≥ 8 mm as the safe diameter.

Indexed as

CholedocholithiasisLaparoscopyPancreatitisAcute DiseaseCommon Bile DuctHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesCommon bile duct stonePrimary duct closureSafe diameterSingle-arm meta-analysesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35247181
OpenAlexW4220868406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.