Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35246737›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2022

Healthcare utilization and costs following non-fatal powdered and non-powdered firearm injuries for children and youth.

Claire de Oliveira, Alison Macpherson, Charlotte Moore Hepburn, Anjie Huang, Rachel Strauss, Ning Liu, Lisa Fiksenbaum, Paul Pageau, David Gomez, Natasha Ruth Saunders

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Claire de OliveiraICES, Toronto, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3961-6008
Alison MacphersonICES, Toronto, Canada.
Charlotte Moore HepburnThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anjie HuangICES, Toronto, Canada.
Rachel StraussICES, Toronto, Canada.
Ning LiuICES, Toronto, Canada.
Lisa FiksenbaumThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Paul PageauDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
David GomezICES, Toronto, Canada.
Natasha Ruth SaundersICES, Toronto, Canada. natasha.saunders@sickkids.ca.
University of Toronto · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CACentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAHospital for Sick Children · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAYork University · CA

Funding

CIHR 167905SickKids Foundation 6100100444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the healthcare and economic burdens of non-fatal firearm injuries for children/youth beyond the initial admission. This study sought to estimate healthcare utilization and total direct healthcare costs of non-fatal powdered and non-powdered (air gun) firearm injuries 1-year post-injury. Using administrative data from 2003 to 2018 on all children/youth 0-24 years old in Ontario, Canada, a matched 1:2 cohort study was conducted to compare children/youth who experienced powdered and non-powdered firearm injuries with those who did not. Mean and median number of healthcare encounters and costs, and respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and interquartile ranges (IQRs), were estimated for both weapon type groups and controls and by intent. Children/youth who experienced a powdered and non-powdered firearm injury had a higher number of healthcare encounters and costs per year than those who did not. Mean 1-year costs for those with powdered and non-powdered firearm injuries were $8825 ($8007-$9643) and $2349 ($2118-$2578), respectively, versus $812 ($567-$1058) and $753 ($594-$911), respectively, for those without. Mean 1-year costs were highest for handgun injuries ($12,875 [95% CI $9941-$15,808]), and for intentional assault-related ($13,498 [$11,843-$15,153]; $3287 [$2213-$4362]), and intentional self-injuries ($14,773 [$6893-$22,652]; $6005 [$2193-$9817]) for both powdered and non-powdered firearm injuries, respectively.   Conclusion: Firearm injuries have substantial healthcare and economic burdens beyond the initial injury-related admission; this should be accounted for when examining the overall impact of firearm injuries. What is Known: • Child/youth firearm injuries have significant health and economic burdens. • However, existing work has mainly examined healthcare utilization and costs of initial admissions and/or have been limited to single-center studies and no studies have provide cost estimates by weapon type and intent. What is New: • Children/youth who suffered powdered firearm injuries had higher mean healthcare utilization and costs than those with non-powdered firearm injuries as well as comparable healthy children/youth. • Mean 1-year costs were highest for handgun injuries ($12,875), and for intentional assault-related ($13,498; $3287), and intentional self-injuries ($14,773; $6005) for powdered and non-powdered firearm injuries, respectively.

Indexed as

FirearmsWounds, GunshotAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesHealth Care CostsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPatient Acceptance of Health CarePowdersYoung AdultPowdersCostsFirearmsGunsInjuryPediatricsSuicideTraumaViolenceYouth

Identifiers

PMID35246737
PMCPMC9110444
OpenAlexW4220695750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.