Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35246709›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2022

Ethnic inequalities in clozapine use among people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a retrospective cohort study using data from electronic clinical records.

Daniela Fonseca de Freitas, India Patel, Giouliana Kadra-Scalzo, Megan Pritchard, Hitesh Shetty, Matthew Broadbent, Rashmi Patel, Johnny Downs, Aviv Segev, Mizanur Khondoker and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetic overlap between treatment-resistant schizophrenia and smoking initiation.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ethnicity and involuntary hospitalisation: a study of intersectional effects.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniela Fonseca de FreitasDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK. Daniela.Fonseca_de_Freitas@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8876-4595
India PatelDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Giouliana Kadra-ScalzoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3182-905X
Megan PritchardDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8872-3614
Hitesh ShettySouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Matthew BroadbentSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rashmi PatelDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9259-8788
Johnny DownsDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8061-295X
Aviv SegevDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9550-3895
Mizanur KhondokerNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1801-1635
James H MacCabeDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6754-1018
Kamaldeep BhuiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9205-2144
Richard D HayesDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4453-244X
King's College London · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBTel Aviv University · ILUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17214Medical Research Council MR/L011794/1Medical Research Council MR/L017105/1Medical Research Council MR/S003118/1Medical Research Council SGL015/1020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClozapine is the most effective intervention for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Several studies report ethnic disparities in clozapine treatment. However, few studies restrict analyses to TRS cohorts alone or address confounding by benign ethnic neutropenia. This study investigates ethnic equity in access to clozapine treatment for people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia spectrum disorder.

methodsA retrospective cohort study, using information from 11 years of clinical records (2007-2017) from the South London and Maudsley NHS Trust. We identified a cohort of service-users with TRS using a validated algorithm. We investigated associations between ethnicity and clozapine treatment, adjusting for sociodemographic factors, psychiatric multi-morbidity, substance misuse, neutropenia, and service-use.

resultsAmong 2239 cases of TRS, Black service-users were less likely to be receive clozapine compared with White British service-users after adjusting for confounders (Black African aOR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.33, 0.74], p = 0.001; Black Caribbean aOR = 0.64, 95% CI [0.43, 0.93], p = 0.019; Black British aOR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.41, 0.91], p = 0.016). It was additionally observed that neutropenia was not related to treatment with clozapine. Also, a detention under the Mental Health Act was negatively associated clozapine receipt, suggesting people with TRS who were detained are less likely to be treated with clozapine.

conclusionBlack service-users with TRS were less likely to receive clozapine than White British service-users. Considering the protective effect of treatment with clozapine, these inequities may place Black service-users at higher risk for hospital admissions and mortality.

Indexed as

ClozapineSchizophreniaCohort StudiesElectronicsEthnicityHumansRetrospective StudiesSchizophrenia, Treatment-ResistantClozapineAsian BritishBenign ethnic neutropeniaBlack BritishClozapineHealth inequalitiesRefractory psychosis

Identifiers

PMID35246709
PMCPMC9246775
OpenAlexW4214935021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.