ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2022
Sociotechnical safeguards for genomic data privacy.
Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Applications and Concerns of ChatGPT and Other Conversational Large Language Models in Health Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Open tools for quantitative anonymization of tabular phenotype data: literature review.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Pooled it
- Caring for Rare Genetic Disease: A Vision for the Future.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- NoisyFlow: differentially private optimal transport using neural networks for secure biomedical data sharing across multiple institutions.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Large-scale human genomic resources drive innovations toward forensic intelligent source attribution and precision identification.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
- Navigating data sharing in research.American journal of human genetics · 2026Review
- Bridging the Governance Gap: A Case for an Indigenous Jurisprudential Framework for Genomic and Biobanking Research in Nigeria.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- Machine learning and multi-omics technologies for precision cardiovascular medicine: advancing diagnosis, risk prediction, and therapeutic guidance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Toward the establishment of best practice guidelines for human research in Genomic Medicine in Brazil.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Fedflow: cloud orchestration for federated learning with the FeatureCloud platform.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Generative artificial intelligence in lung cancer care: current applications, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Biomedical data repositories require governance for artificial intelligence/machine learning applications at every step.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- ROFI: a deep learning-based ophthalmic sign-preserving and reversible patient face anonymizer.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Should recipient parents have access to gamete donors' raw genomic data? Clinical, legal, and ethical considerations.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- KmerCrypt: private k-mer search with homomorphic encryption.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Engaging migrants and immigrants in genetics research.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Toward Responsible and Sustainable Data Sharing in Large-scale Cohort-based Genomic Research.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Development and psychometric evaluation of a new genetic attitudes questionnaire in two national samples of United States residents.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Federated learning for the pathogenicity annotation of genetic variants in multi-site clinical settings.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Toward owner governance in genomic data privacy with Governome.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent developments in a variety of sectors, including health care, research and the direct-to-consumer industry, have led to a dramatic increase in the amount of genomic data that are collected, used and shared. This state of affairs raises new and challenging concerns for personal privacy, both legally and technically. This Review appraises existing and emerging threats to genomic data privacy and discusses how well current legal frameworks and technical safeguards mitigate these concerns. It concludes with a discussion of remaining and emerging challenges and illustrates possible solutions that can balance protecting privacy and realizing the benefits that result from the sharing of genetic information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.