Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35246580›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Spatial distribution of live gut microbiota and bile acid metabolism in various parts of human large intestine.

Daisuke Chinda, Toshihiko Takada, Tatsuya Mikami, Kensuke Shimizu, Kosuke Oana, Tetsu Arai, Kazuki Akitaya, Hirotake Sakuraba, Miyuki Katto, Yusuke Nagara and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. mSystems · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Activity ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daisuke ChindaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hematology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan. chinda@hirosaki-u.ac.jp.
Toshihiko TakadaBasic Research Department, Yakult Central Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuya MikamiInnovation Center for Health Promotion, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan.
Kensuke ShimizuBasic Research Department, Yakult Central Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Kosuke OanaBasic Research Department, Yakult Central Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsu AraiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hematology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan.
Kazuki AkitayaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hematology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan.
Hirotake SakurabaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hematology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan.
Miyuki KattoBasic Research Department, Yakult Central Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke NagaraBasic Research Department, Yakult Central Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi MakinoFood Research Department, Yakult Central Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Daichi FujiiMicrobiological Research Department, Yakult Central Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji OishiBasic Research Department, Yakult Central Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinsaku FukudaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hematology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan.
Yakult Central Institute · JPHirosaki University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiomics is based on analysis of both live and dead cells in the stool. However, to understand the ecology of gut microbiota and their symbiotic relationships with hosts, spatial distribution of live bacteria must be examined. Here, we analyzed the live composition of luminal microbiota (LM) and mucosa-associated microbiota (MAM) in the ascending and descending colons and the rectums of 10 healthy adults and compared it with the total composition. The abundance of Lachnospiraceae in live LM decreased along the gut length and was significantly lower than that in total LM. Contrastingly, the abundance of Bacteroidaceae and Bifidobacteriaceae in live LM was higher than that in total LM, suggesting differences in death rate during gut migration. Live Enterobacteriaceae levels in MAM were significantly higher in rectum than in the ascending and descending colons and in LM. High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of luminal bile acids revealed that 7α-dehydroxylation occurred towards the rectum. In live LM where a bile acid-inducible gene could be detected, 7α-dehydroxylation rates were higher than those in the group without the gene. Overall, we showed differences in live bacteria composition among three gut sites and between LM and MAM, highlighting the importance of understanding their spatial distribution.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAdultBacteriaBile Acids and SaltsHumansIntestine, LargeBile Acids and Salts

Identifiers

PMID35246580
PMCPMC8897406
OpenAlexW4214823317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.