Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35246571›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Temporal properties of positive and negative defocus on emmetropization.

Xiaoying Zhu, Pauline Kang, David Troilo, Alexandra Benavente-Perez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. IMI 2023 Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  8. GABABiomolecules · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoying ZhuCollege of Optometry, State University of New York, 33 West 42nd Street, New York, NY, 10036, USA.
Pauline KangSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
David TroiloCollege of Optometry, State University of New York, 33 West 42nd Street, New York, NY, 10036, USA.
Alexandra Benavente-PerezCollege of Optometry, State University of New York, 33 West 42nd Street, New York, NY, 10036, USA. abenavente@sunyopt.edu.
SUNY College of Optometry · USUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Accomodation and the Development of Refractive StateR01EY011228 · NEI · STATE COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI TROILO, DAVID B · 1995 to 2011
$3.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying the temporal integration of visual signals is crucial to understand how time spent on different visual tasks can affect emmetropization and refractive error development. In this study we assessed the effect of interrupting positive and negative lens-imposed defocus with brief periods of unrestricted vision or darkness. A total of forty-six marmosets were treated monocularly with soft contact lenses for 4 weeks from 10 weeks of age (OD: + 5D or - 5D; OS: plano). Two control groups wore + 5D (n = 5) or - 5D (n = 13) lenses continuously for 9 h/day. Two experimental groups had lens-wear interrupted for 30 min twice/day at noon and mid-afternoon by removing lenses and monitoring vision while marmosets sat at the center of a viewing cylinder (normal vision interruption, + 5D: n = 7; - 5D: n = 8) or while they were in the dark (dark interruption, + 5D: n = 7; - 5D: n = 6). The interruption period (30 min/day) represented approx. 10% of the total stimulation time (9 h/day). On-axis refractive error (RE) and vitreous chamber depth (VCD) were measured using an autorefractor and high frequency A-scan ultrasound at baseline and after treatment. Wearing + 5D lenses continuously 9 h/day for 4 weeks induced slowed eye growth and hyperopic shifts in RE in treated relative to contralateral control eyes (relative change, VCD: - 25 ± 11 μm, p > 0.05; RE: + 1.24 ± 0.58 D, p > 0.05), whereas - 5D lens wear resulted in larger and myopic eyes (relative change, VCD: + 109 ± 24 μm, p < 0.001; RE: - 2.03 ± 0.56 D, p < 0.05), significantly different from those in the + 5D lens-treated animals (p < 0.01 for both). Interrupting lens induced defocus with periods of normal vision or darkness for approx. 10% of the treatment time affected the resulting compensation differently for myopic and hyperopic defocus. Interrupting defocus with unrestricted vision reduced - 5D defocus compensation but enhanced + 5D defocus compensation (- 5D, VCD: + 18 ± 33 μm; RE: - 0.93 ± 0.50 D, both p > 0.05; + 5D, VCD: - 86 ± 30 μm; RE: + 1.93 ± 0.50 D, both p < 0.05). Interrupting defocus with darkness also decreased - 5D defocus compensation, but had little effect on + 5D defocus compensation (- 5D, VCD: + 73 ± 34 μm, RE: - 1.13 ± 0.77 D, p > 0.05 for both; + 5D, VCD: - 10 ± 28 μm, RE: + 1.22 ± 0.50 D, p > 0.05 for both). These findings in a non-human primate model of emmetropization are similar to those described in other species and confirm a non-linear model of visual signal integration over time. This suggests a mechanism that is conserved across species and may have clinical implications for myopia management in school-aged children.

Indexed as

HyperopiaMyopiaAnimalsCallithrixDisease Models, AnimalEyeRefraction, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID35246571
PMCPMC8897502
OpenAlexW4220985461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.