Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35246490›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2022

Eculizumab versus rituximab in generalised myasthenia gravis.

Christopher Nelke, Christina B Schroeter, Frauke Stascheit, Marc Pawlitzki, Liesa Regner-Nelke, Niklas Huntemann, Ercan Arat, Menekse Öztürk, Nico Melzer, Philipp Mergenthaler and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of different dosages of rituximab for myasthenia gravis: a single-arm meta-analysis.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. C5 complement inhibition versus FcRn modulation in generalised myasthenia gravis.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2025
    Observational
  8. New and Emerging Biological Therapies for Myasthenia Gravis: A Focussed Review for Clinical Decision-Making.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Eculizumab in thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis: a real-world cohort study.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher Nelke *Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6048-7143
Christina B Schroeter *Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Frauke StascheitDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5306-7880
Marc PawlitzkiDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Liesa Regner-NelkeDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Niklas HuntemannDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Ercan AratDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Menekse ÖztürkDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Nico MelzerDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Philipp MergenthalerDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9753-6711
Asmae GassaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Koln, Germany.
Henning StetefeldDepartement of Neurology, Uniklinik Koln, Koln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.
Michael SchroeterDepartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Koln, Germany.
Benjamin BergerDepartment of Neurology and Neurophysiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Andreas TotzeckDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Tim HagenackerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Stefanie SchreiberDepartment of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4439-4374
Stefan VielhaberOtto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany.
Hans-Peter HartungDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Andreas MeiselDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Heinz WiendlDepartment of Neurology - Inflammatory Disorders of the Nervous System and Neurooncology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Sven G MeuthDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Tobias RuckDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany Tobias.Ruck@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEEssen University Hospital · DEOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMyasthenia gravis (MG) is the most common autoimmune disorder affecting the neuromuscular junction. However, evidence shaping treatment decisions, particularly for treatment-refractory cases, is sparse. Both rituximab and eculizumab may be considered as therapeutic options for refractory MG after insufficient symptom control by standard immunosuppressive therapies.

methodsIn this retrospective observational study, we included 57 rituximab-treated and 20 eculizumab-treated patients with MG to compare the efficacy of treatment agents in generalised, therapy-refractory anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody (anti-AChR-ab)-mediated MG with an observation period of 24 months. Change in the quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) score was defined as the primary outcome parameter. Differences between groups were determined in an optimal full propensity score matching model.

resultsBoth groups were comparable in terms of clinical and demographic characteristics. Eculizumab was associated with a better outcome compared with rituximab, as measured by the change of the QMG score at 12 and 24 months of treatment. Minimal manifestation of disease was more frequently achieved in eculizumab-treated patients than rituximab-treated patients at 12 and 24 months after baseline. However, the risk of myasthenic crisis (MC) was not ameliorated in either group.

interpretationThis retrospective, observational study provides the first real-world evidence supporting the use of eculizumab for the treatment of refractory, anti-AChR-ab positive MG. Nonetheless, the risk of MC remained high and prompts the need for intensified monitoring and further research effort aimed at this vulnerable patient cohort.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedMyasthenia GravisHumansRetrospective StudiesRituximabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedeculizumabRituximabmyasthenianeuroimmunologyneuromuscular

Identifiers

PMID35246490
PMCPMC9016243
OpenAlexW4214814527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.