Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35246471›Full record

ReviewRMD open2022

Gender equity in academic rheumatology: is there a gender gap at European rheumatology conferences?

Neelam Hassan, Leonieke Jj van Mens, Uta Kiltz, Laura Andreoli, Concha Delgado-Beltran, Pavel V Ovseiko, Laure Gossec, Laura C Coates

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RMD open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gender Equity in Academic Medicine.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023
    Article
  14. Gender climate in rheumatology peer review.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Gender equity in rheumatology leadership in the Asia-Pacific.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Neelam HassanMusculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Leonieke Jj van MensClinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0992-4448
Uta KiltzRheumatology, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5668-4497
Laura AndreoliDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9107-3218
Concha Delgado-BeltranRheumatology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.
Pavel V OvseikoRadcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3504-2177
Laure GossecINSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4528-310X
Laura C CoatesNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK laura.coates@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4756-663X

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo obtain an overview of gender equity at European rheumatology conferences.

methodsThe proportion of women invited as either moderators or speakers to the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) annual congresses and national conferences in Europe was calculated from the published congress materials from EULAR annual congresses (2015-2019) and the 2019 national conferences of France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. Data from EULAR congresses were further categorised by type of session. Significance testing was conducted using χ

resultsThe proportion of combined women moderators and speakers at EULAR varied from 40% to 43% between 2015 and 2019 with no obvious trend over time. There were higher proportions of women in the Health Professionals in Rheumatology and People with Arthritis and Rheumatism sessions (>50% consistently). However, these sessions represent <25% of EULAR congress invitations. Representation of women at the EULAR congress in 2019 (39.6%) was significantly higher than at the national congresses in France (28.6%) and Germany (29.6%) but similar to that observed in Italy (33.7%), Spain (41.7%) and the UK (42%).

conclusionWomen account for less than half of invited moderators and speakers at the conferences reviewed. Compared with historical EULAR data in 2003 (16%) and in 2004 (19%), the gender gap at EULAR congresses has narrowed considerably, but there remains a need to monitor and improve women's representation.

Indexed as

RheumatologyEuropeFemaleGender EquityHumansSex FactorsSocieties, Medicalhealth services researchqualitative researchquality indicators, health care

Identifiers

PMID35246471
PMCPMC8900061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.