Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35246447›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2022

The views of GPs about using sit-stand desks: an observational study.

Gregory J H Biddle, Nicholas Thomas, Charlotte L Edwardson, Stacy A Clemes, Amanda J Daley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory J H BiddleSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK g.j.biddle@lboro.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4394-0655
Nicholas ThomasClinical Innovation and Research Centre, Royal College of General Practitioners, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0460-6870
Charlotte L EdwardsonDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6485-9330
Stacy A ClemesSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5612-5898
Amanda J DaleySchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4866-8726
Loughborough University · GBRoyal College of General Practitioners · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOccupational sitting is associated with negative health outcomes. Sit-stand workstations have been shown to reduce sitting time in office workers, although there is no evidence on whether this change to practice would be acceptable to GPs.

aimTo investigate GPs views about the use of sit-stand desks within general practice and the potential impact they may have on the nature and quality of consultations with adult patients. DESIGN &

settingObservational study involving GPs located across the UK.

methodAn online survey was emailed to members of the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) and shared on social media. Only GPs working in the UK were eligible. The survey included questions on socio-demographics, GPs views about the use of sit-stand desks within their work, their levels of physical activity, total time spent sitting at work each day, and time spent at work.

results14 142 surveys were sent by the RCGP to their members with 810 GPs responding, with a further 33 responding via social media. 60.6% of GPs would like a sit-stand desks in their consultation room, while 19.2% already had one. Most GPs thought sit-stand desks could be used for telephone consultations (91.9%) and administration tasks (92.3%). There was less agreement about whether they could be used during face-to-face consultations (35.0% agreed), with the potential impact on the doctor-patient relationship raised as the primary concern.

conclusionThe implementation of sit-stand desks had support from GPs, but their possible impact on the doctor-patient relationship should be considered in future research.

Indexed as

General practicegeneral practitionersoccupational healthsedentary behavioursit-stand desks

Identifiers

PMID35246447
PMCPMC9680747
OpenAlexW4214932406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.