Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35246270›Full record

ReviewArthroplasty (London, England)2022

Artificial intelligence in diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis and prediction of arthroplasty outcomes: a review.

Lok Sze Lee, Ping Keung Chan, Chunyi Wen, Wing Chiu Fung, Amy Cheung, Vincent Wai Kwan Chan, Man Hong Cheung, Henry Fu, Chun Hoi Yan, Kwong Yuen Chiu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. [Comparison of the effects of sciatic nerve block combined with continuted femoral nerve block or continuted adductor canal block on pain and motor function after total knee arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lok Sze LeeDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ping Keung ChanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. cpk464@yahoo.com.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1969-0895
Chunyi WenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Wing Chiu FungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Amy CheungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Vincent Wai Kwan ChanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Man Hong CheungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Henry FuDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chun Hoi YanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Gleneagles Hospital Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Kwong Yuen ChiuDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence is an emerging technology with rapid growth and increasing applications in orthopaedics. This study aimed to summarize the existing evidence and recent developments of artificial intelligence in diagnosing knee osteoarthritis and predicting outcomes of total knee arthroplasty.

methodsPubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for articles published in peer-reviewed journals between January 1, 2010 and May 31, 2021. The terms included: 'artificial intelligence', 'machine learning', 'knee', 'osteoarthritis', and 'arthroplasty'. We selected studies focusing on the use of AI in diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis, prediction of the need for total knee arthroplasty, and prediction of outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. Non-English language articles and articles with no English translation were excluded. A reviewer screened the articles for the relevance to the research questions and strength of evidence.

resultsMachine learning models demonstrated promising results for automatic grading of knee radiographs and predicting the need for total knee arthroplasty. The artificial intelligence algorithms could predict postoperative outcomes regarding patient-reported outcome measures, patient satisfaction and short-term complications. Important weaknesses of current artificial intelligence algorithms included the lack of external validation, the limitations of inherent biases in clinical data, the requirement of large datasets in training, and significant research gaps in the literature.

conclusionsArtificial intelligence offers a promising solution to improve detection and management of knee osteoarthritis. Further research to overcome the weaknesses of machine learning models may enhance reliability and allow for future use in routine healthcare settings.

Indexed as

ArthroplastyArtificial intelligenceMachine learningOsteoarthritisReplacementTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35246270
PMCPMC8897859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.