Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35246223›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2022

Predicting molecular initiating events using chemical target annotations and gene expression.

Joseph L Bundy, Richard Judson, Antony J Williams, Chris Grulke, Imran Shah, Logan J Everett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph L BundyBiomolecular and Computational Toxicology Division, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Durham, NC, 27709, USA.
Richard JudsonBiomolecular and Computational Toxicology Division, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Durham, NC, 27709, USA.
Antony J WilliamsChemical Characterization and Exposure Division, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Durham, NC, 27709, USA.
Chris GrulkeChemical Characterization and Exposure Division, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Durham, NC, 27709, USA.
Imran ShahBiomolecular and Computational Toxicology Division, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Durham, NC, 27709, USA.
Logan J EverettBiomolecular and Computational Toxicology Division, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Durham, NC, 27709, USA. everett.logan@epa.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9713-6099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe advent of high-throughput transcriptomic screening technologies has resulted in a wealth of publicly available gene expression data associated with chemical treatments. From a regulatory perspective, data sets that cover a large chemical space and contain reference chemicals offer utility for the prediction of molecular initiating events associated with chemical exposure. Here, we integrate data from a large compendium of transcriptomic responses to chemical exposure with a comprehensive database of chemical-protein associations to train binary classifiers that predict mechanism(s) of action from transcriptomic responses. First, we linked reference chemicals present in the LINCS L1000 gene expression data collection to chemical identifiers in RefChemDB, a database of chemical-protein interactions. Next, we trained binary classifiers on MCF7 human breast cancer cell line derived gene expression profiles and chemical-protein labels using six classification algorithms to identify optimal analysis parameters. To validate classifier accuracy, we used holdout data sets, training-excluded reference chemicals, and empirical significance testing of null models derived from permuted chemical-protein associations. To identify classifiers that have variable predicting performance across training data derived from different cellular contexts, we trained a separate set of binary classifiers on the PC3 human prostate cancer cell line.

resultsWe trained classifiers using expression data associated with chemical treatments linked to 51 molecular initiating events. This analysis identified and validated 9 high-performing classifiers with empirical p-values lower than 0.05 and internal accuracies ranging from 0.73 to 0.94 and holdout accuracies of 0.68 to 0.92. High-ranking predictions for training-excluded reference chemicals demonstrating that predictive accuracy extends beyond the set of chemicals used in classifier training. To explore differences in classifier performance as a function of training data cellular context, MCF7-trained classifier accuracies were compared to classifiers trained on the PC3 gene expression data for the same molecular initiating events.

conclusionsThis methodology can offer insight in prioritizing candidate perturbagens of interest for targeted screens. This approach can also help guide the selection of relevant cellular contexts for screening classes of candidate perturbagens using cell line specific model performance.

Indexed as

Binary classificationChemical safety screeningHigh throughput transcriptomicsLibrary of integrated cellular signaturesMachine learningMolecular initiating eventsRefChemDB

Identifiers

PMID35246223
PMCPMC8895536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.