ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2022
An international comparative analysis of public reimbursement of orphan drugs in Canadian provinces compared to European countries.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Access to orphan drugs in adults with inherited metabolic diseases in Switzerland: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Burden of disease in adult patients with hereditary angioedema: results from a multinational survey.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Burden of hereditary angioedema: results from a multinational survey of caregivers for adult and pediatric patients.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Toward Timely and Equitable Advanced Biomarker Testing for Patients with Metastatic Cancer in Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- A Comparative Analysis of International Drug Price Negotiation Frameworks: An Interview Study of Key Stakeholders.The Milbank quarterly · 2024Article
- Market Access Challenges and Solutions in Cell and Gene Therapy in The Netherlands.Journal of market access & health policy · 2024Article
- Are We Capturing the Socioeconomic Burden of Rare Genetic Disease? A Scoping Review of Economic Evaluations and Cost-of-Illness Studies.PharmacoEconomics · 2023Article
- Article
- Is Canada missing out? An assessment of drugs approved internationally between 2016 and 2020 and not submitted for Health Canada review.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023Article
- Historical and projected public spending on drugs for rare diseases in Canada between 2010 and 2025.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Article
- Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits?Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Article
- Gene Therapy for Neuromuscular Diseases: Health Economic Challenges and Future Perspectives.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2022Review
- Navigating rare disease medications: A pharmacist's primer.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPCArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Canadian government has committed to developing a national strategy for drugs for rare diseases starting in 2022. Considering this announcement, we conducted a comparative analysis to examine patient access to therapies for rare disease in Canada relative to Europe and the U.S.
methodsGiven its similarity to the Canadian health care system, we used Europe as the reference point to analyze all of the therapies with an orphan drug designation approved by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) from 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2020. We then contrasted access to these drugs in Canada (Health Canada) and the U.S. (Food and Drug Administration, FDA). We focused on: (1) the number of therapies for rare diseases entering the Canadian market; (2) the percentage of these therapies that are publicly available to Canadians; and (3) the timelines for patients to access these therapies in Canada.
resultsSixty-three approved therapies with an orphan drug designation from the EMA were identified. Fifty-three (84%) of these drugs had also been submitted to the FDA for approval, and 41 (65%) were submitted to Health Canada for approval. In Europe, Germany, Denmark, and the U.K. had the highest percentage of publicly reimbursed orphan drugs (84%, 70%, 68%, respectively). In comparison, Ontario (32%), Quebec (25%), and Alberta (25%) had the highest percentage of drugs reimbursed among the Canadian provinces. The shortest median duration (in months) from EMA approval to jurisdictional decision on reimbursement was in Austria (3.2), followed by Germany (4.1), and Finland (6.0). In Canada, the shortest median duration (in months) from regulatory approval to reimbursement was in British Columbia (17.3), Quebec (19.6) and Manitoba (19.6), while the longest duration was in P.E.I (38.5), followed by Nova Scotia (25.9), and Newfoundland (25.1).
conclusionsOur comparative analysis found that relative to the EU Canadians had less frequent and timely access to therapies for rare diseases. This highlights the need for a rare disease strategy in Canada that allows for clear identification and transparent tracking of the pathway for rare disease drugs, and ultimately optimizes the number of patients with access to these therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.