Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35246155›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2022

Effect of deploying biomedical equipment technician on the functionality of medical equipment in the government hospitals of rural Nepal.

Rita Thapa, Alison Yih, Ashish Chauhan, Salomi Poudel, Sagar Singh, Suresh Shrestha, Suresh Tamang, Rishav Shrestha, Ruma Rajbhandari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bedside critical care training: A quasi-experimental study in the paediatric emergency department of a referral hospital in Nigeria.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rita ThapaNick Simons Institute, EPC 1813 Sanepa, Box 8975, Lalitpur, Nepal. ritathapa@nsi.edu.np.ORCID 0000-0003-1942-9635
Alison YihHarvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Ashish ChauhanNick Simons Institute, EPC 1813 Sanepa, Box 8975, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Salomi PoudelNick Simons Institute, EPC 1813 Sanepa, Box 8975, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Sagar SinghNick Simons Institute, EPC 1813 Sanepa, Box 8975, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Suresh ShresthaNick Simons Institute, EPC 1813 Sanepa, Box 8975, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Suresh TamangNick Simons Institute, EPC 1813 Sanepa, Box 8975, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Rishav ShresthaNick Simons Institute, EPC 1813 Sanepa, Box 8975, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Ruma RajbhandariHarvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical equipment plays a crucial role in the provision of quality healthcare services, despite this more than 50% of equipment in developing countries are non-functioning due to a lack of appropriate human resources to maintain. To address this problem some government hospitals of Nepal have deployed a mid-level technical cadre called 'Biomedical Equipment Technician' (BMET). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of deploying a BMET on the functionality of medical equipment in government hospitals of rural Nepal.

methodsWe used a mixed-methods approach with a comparative research design. A comprehensive range of 2189 pieces of medical equipment at 22 hospitals with and without BMET were observed to assess their functional status. Medical equipment were stratified into 6 categories based on department and T tests were conducted. We collected qualitative data from 9 BMETs, 22 medical superintendents, and 22 health staff using semi-structured interviews and focus-group discussions. Thematic content analysis was conducted to explore how the BMET's work was perceived.

findingsThe quantity of non-functional devices in hospitals without BMETs was double that of hospitals with BMETs (14% and 7% respectively, p < 0.005). Results were similar across all departments including General (16% versus 3%, p = 0.056), Lab (15% versus 7%, p < 0.005) and Operation Theater (14% versus 5%, p < 0.005). Hospitals with BMETs had fewer overall non-functional devices requiring simple or advanced repair compared to hospitals without BMETs [3% versus 7% (p < 0.005) simple; 4% versus 6% (p < 0.005) advanced]. In our qualitative analysis, we found that BMETs were highly appreciated by hospital staff. Hospital workers perceived that having a BMET on staff, rather than twice-yearly visits from central-level maintenance technicians, is an effective way to keep medical equipment functional. However, without a favorable working environment, the BMET alone cannot perform optimally.

conclusionsHaving a BMET at a rural government hospital has a substantial positive effect on the functional status of medical devices at the hospital. BMETs should be deployed at all rural hospitals to increase the functionality of medical devices, thereby improving the working environment and quality of health services provided.

Indexed as

Maintenance and Engineering, HospitalGovernmentHospitals, PublicHumansNepalWorkforceAssessmentBMETEffectivenessFunctioningMedical EquipmentNepal

Identifiers

PMID35246155
PMCPMC8895523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.