ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022
Intelligent virtual case learning system based on real medical records and natural language processing.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of a generative AI-powered digital tutor integrated with a knowledge graph in anatomy education for nursing students: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Integration of case-based learning and three-dimensional printing for tetralogy of fallot instruction in clinical medical undergraduates: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2024Trial
- Widely available, general-purpose generative AI applications for radiology education: determining the teaching quality of synthetic pediatric neuroradiology images.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Development and pilot evaluation of a large language model-based clinical simulation system for medical education in gastroenterology.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Internal Medicine Clerkship: Results of a National Survey.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Transformative Potential, Current Applications, and Future Implications.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education clinical skills curricula: a scoping review of implementations since 2022.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Recent advances in artificial intelligence-assisted medical imaging education.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology education: transformative applications, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- A paradigm shift and practical exploration in veterinary pharmacology and toxicology teaching reform in China's frontier regions under AI empowerment.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: a Scoping Review of the Evidence for Efficacy and Future Directions.Medical science educator · 2025Review
- Comparing the impact of online and in-person active learning in preclinical medical education.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Review
- A Symbolic AI Approach to Medical Training.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Powered Training Database for Clinical Thinking: App Development Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Recent advances and educational strategies in diagnostic imaging for temporomandibular disorders: a narrative literature review.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- The effect of case-based mobile virtual patient application on students' academic achievement in clinical reasoning skills.Medical education online · 2024Article
- The Transformative Power of Virtual Hospitals for Revolutionising Healthcare Delivery.Public health reviews · 2024Review
- Improving the resident assessment process: application of App-based e-training platform and lean thinking.BMC medical education · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundModernizing medical education by using artificial intelligence and other new technologies to improve the clinical thinking ability of medical students is an important research topic in recent years. Prominent medical universities are actively conducting research and exploration in this area. In particular, given the shortage of human resources, the need to maintain social distancing to prevent the spread of the epidemics, and the increase in the cost of medical education, it is critical to harness online learning to promote medical education. A virtual case learning system that uses natural language processing technology to process and present a hospital's real medical records and evaluate student responses can effectively improve medical students' clinical thinking abilities.
objectiveThe purpose of this study is to develop a virtual case system, AIteach, based on actual complete hospital medical records and natural language processing technology, and achieve clinical thinking ability improvement through a contactless, self-service, trial-and-error system application.
methodsCase extraction is performed on a hospital's case data center and the best-matching cases are produced through natural language processing, word segmentation, synonym conversion, and sorting. A standard clinical questioning data module, virtual case data module, and student learning difficulty module are established to achieve simulation. Students can view the objective examination and inspection data of actual cases, including details of the consultation and physical examination, and automatically provide their learning response via a multi-dimensional evaluation system. In order to assess the changes in students' clinical thinking after using AIteach, 15 medical graduate students were subjected to two simulation tests before and after learning through the virtual case system. The tests, which included the full-process case examination of cases having the same difficulty level, examined core clinical thinking test points such as consultation, physical examination, and disposal, and generated multi-dimensional evaluation indicators (rigor, logic, system, agility, and knowledge expansion). Thus, a complete and credible evaluation system is developed.
resultsThe AIteach system used an internal and external double-cycle learning model. Students collect case information through online inquiries, physical examinations, and other means, analyze the information for feedback verification, and generate their detailed multi-dimensional clinical thinking after learning. The feedback report can be evaluated and its knowledge gaps analyzed. Such learning based on real cases is in line with traditional methods of disease diagnosis and treatment, and addresses the practical difficulties in reflecting actual disease progression while keeping pace with recent research. Test results regarding short-term learning showed that the average score (P < 0.01) increased from 69.87 to 85.6, the five indicators of clinical thinking evaluation improved, and there was obvious logical improvement, reaching 47%.
conclusionBy combining real cases and natural language processing technology, AIteach can provide medical students (including undergraduates and postgraduates) with an online learning tool for clinical thinking training. Virtual case learning helps students to cultivate clinical thinking abilities even in the absence of clinical tutor, such as during pandemics or natural disasters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.