Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35246083›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) experiences and release plans among federally incarcerated individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) in Ontario, Canada: a mixed-methods study.

Cayley Russell, Frishta Nafeh, Michelle Pang, Shanna Farrell MacDonald, Dena Derkzen, Jürgen Rehm, Benedikt Fischer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Methods and tools used to assess patient experience with healthcare services in prisons: a scoping review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The State of Mental Health Services for Incarcerated Adults in Ontario: A Scoping Review.International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Cayley RussellInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research (IMHPR), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) & Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada. Cayley.Russell@camh.ca.
Frishta NafehInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research (IMHPR), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) & Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.
Michelle PangInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research (IMHPR), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) & Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.
Shanna Farrell MacDonaldResearch Branch, Correctional Service Canada, 340 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, ON, K1P 0P9, Canada.
Dena DerkzenResearch Branch, Correctional Service Canada, 340 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, ON, K1P 0P9, Canada.
Jürgen RehmInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research (IMHPR), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) & Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.
Benedikt FischerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAWilfrid Laurier University · CASechenov University · RUUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

CIHR SMN-139150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncarcerated populations experience an elevated prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD). Federal correctional institutions in Canada have increasingly treated OUD among correctional populations via opioid agonist treatment (OAT) - an evidence based pharmacotherapy that works to reduce drug use and related health harms. However, there is limited evidence regarding incarcerated individuals' experiences with institutional-based OAT, as well potential OAT-related community release prospects. This information is important for optimal treatment retention and improved health. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a longitudinal follow-up study examining OAT-related experiences among federally incarcerated individuals before and after community release. This article focuses on the baseline (pre-release) data.

methodsThis mixed-methods study examined OAT-related experiences and release prospects among n = 46 individuals scheduled for community release, recruited from seven federal prisons located in Ontario, Canada. Participants underwent a comprehensive interviewer-administered on-site assessment, including quantitative and qualitative items. Assessment data was furthermore linked to administrative correctional data. Data were analyzed using thematic qualitative and descriptive quantitative approaches.

resultsParticipants had complex histories with opioid use including related negative health outcomes. Experiences with institutional OAT were divergent and provision was not standardized; those with OAT engagement pre-admission did not experience many challenges, whereas those initiating OAT during incarceration experienced barriers such as treatment waitlists and adverse process experiences. Most participants expressed a preference for buprenorphine-naloxone over methadone, but described difficulties accessing it. Participants were keen to transition into community-based treatment, yet envisaged prospective barriers and facilitators concerning successful reintegration and treatment continuity.

conclusionsMajor barriers towards the current administration of OAT in federal correctional systems in Canada exist, including extensive waitlists, non-standardized practices, and challenges accessing preferred OAT formulations; this contributes to sub-optimal treatment. Eliminating waitlists, standardizing OAT provision, providing additional OAT options, and more comprehensive release planning may be essential for treatment retention and positive outcomes.

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersPrisonersAnalgesics, OpioidAvenaCorrectional FacilitiesFollow-Up StudiesHumansMethadoneOntarioOpiate Substitution TreatmentProspective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidMethadoneBuprenorphine-naloxone (Suboxone)CanadaCommunity-releaseFederal Correctional InstitutionsHealth servicesMethadoneOpioid agonist treatmentOpioidsOpioid use disorderPrison

Identifiers

PMID35246083
PMCPMC8897889
OpenAlexW4214850994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.