Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35246064›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

Difficulty and help with activities of daily living among older adults living alone during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-country population-based study.

Shanquan Chen, Linda A Jones, Shan Jiang, Huajie Jin, Dong Dong, Xi Chen, Dan Wang, Yun Zhang, Li Xiang, Anna Zhu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Caregiving responsibilities, living alone, and mental health among older women during a time of collective stress.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shanquan ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK. sc2147@medschl.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4724-4892
Linda A JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
Shan JiangSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Huajie JinKing's Health Economics (KHE), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Dong DongJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Xi ChenDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Dan WangFaculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada.
Yun ZhangProgram in Public Health, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Li XiangSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Anna ZhuDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rudolf N CardinalDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Albert C Shaw · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Yale Alzheimer Disease Research CenterP30AG066508 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN M STRITTMATTER, CHRISTOPHER H VAN DYCK · 2020 to 2026
$30.2M
Social Pension, Health, and Healthy AgingK01AG053408 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, XI · 2018 to 2021
$514k
Medical Research Council MC_PC_17213Medical Research Council MR/W014386/1NIA NIH HHS K01 AG053408NIA NIH HHS K01AG053408NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066508u.s. pepper center scholar award P30AG021342Yale Alzheimer 's Disease Research Center P30AG066508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults who live alone and have difficulties in activities of daily living (ADLs) may have been more vulnerable during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, little is known about pandemic-related changes in ADL assistance (such as home care, domiciliary care) and its international variation. We examined international patterns and changes in provision of ADL assistance, and related these to country-level measures including national income and health service expenditure.

methodsWe analysed data covering 29 countries from three longitudinal cohort studies (Health and Retirement Study, English Longitudinal Study of Aging, and Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe). Eligible people were aged ≥50 years and living alone. Outcomes included ADL difficulty status (assessed via six basic ADLs and five instrumental ADLs) and receipt of ADL assistance. Wealth-related inequality and need-related inequity in ADL assistance were measured using Erreygers' corrected concentration index (ECI). Correlations were estimated between prevalence/inequality/inequity in ADL assistance and national health-related indicators. We hypothesized these measures would be associated with health system factors such as affordability and availability of ADL assistance, as well as active ageing awareness.

resultsDuring COVID-19, 18.4% of older adults living alone reported ADL difficulties (ranging from 8.8% in Switzerland to 29.2% in the USA) and 56.8% of those reporting difficulties received ADL assistance (ranging from 38.7% in the UK to 79.8% in Lithuania). Females were more likely to receive ADL assistance than males in 16/29 countries; the sex gap increased further during the pandemic. Wealth-related ECIs indicated socioeconomic equality in ADL assistance within 24/39 countries before the pandemic, and significant favouring of the less wealthy in 18/29 countries during the pandemic. Needs-related ECIs indicated less equity in assistance with ADLs during the pandemic than before. Our hypotheses on the association between ADL provision measures and health system factors were confirmed before COVID-19, but unexpectedly disconfirmed during COVID-19.

conclusionThis study revealed an unequal (and in some countries, partly needs-mismatched) response from countries to older adults living alone during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings might inform future research about, and policies for, older adults living alone, particularly regarding social protection responses during crises.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCOVID-19AgedFemaleHome EnvironmentHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Activities of daily livingCOVID-19Domiciliary careLive aloneOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID35246064
PMCPMC8894568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.