ArticleBMC neurology2022
Spotlight on MuSK positive myasthenia gravis: clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes.
Article in BMC neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myasthenia Crisis as First Presentation of MuSk Positive Myasthenia Gravis: A Case Report.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2025Article
- Clinical Features and Prognostic Analysis of MuSK-Antibody-Positive Myasthenia Gravis versus Double-Seropositive Myasthenia Gravis: A Single-Center Study from Central South China.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2024Article
- Efficacy and safety of rozanolixizumab in patients with muscle-specific tyrosine kinase autoantibody-positive generalised myasthenia gravis: a subgroup analysis of the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adaptive phase III MycarinG study.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the clinical characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with myasthenia gravis with antibodies to muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK-MG).
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the cases of 21 patients with confirmed MuSK-MG between January 2012 and January 2020 in our centre. Detailed clinical data and long-term follow-up information were summarized.
resultsFemales (17/21, 81%) predominated among these MuSK-MG patients, and the mean age of onset in this group was 51.86 ± 16.16 years. MuSK-MG patients were divided into three subgroups according to the symptoms of muscle weakness at onset: ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG, 47.6%), bulbar myasthenia gravis (BMG, 42.9%), and generalized myasthenia gravis (GMG, 9.5%). The mean progression time from symptom onset to other muscle group involvement in OMG patients was 4.38 ± 2.54 months. Pyridostigmine bromide was adopted in 81.0% of patients, and 90.5% of patients received corticosteroids. Compared to usage in hospitals, the median daily dose of corticosteroids decreased significantly at the last follow-up. A total of 85.7% of patients received a long-term follow-up, with an average time of 1202.17 ± 976.73 days. At the end of the follow-up period, 4.8% of patients had achieved complete stable remission, 42.9% of patients had minimal manifestations, 19.0% had improved, the condition of 4.8% of patients remained unchanged, and 9.5% of patients died.
conclusionFemale patients were more prevalent in this study, and MuSK-MG patients rapidly progressed to a generalized state. Although approximately 50% of MuSK-MG patients can achieve a favourable outcome with conventional immunosuppressants, complete stable remission is rare, and approximately 15% respond poorly. More effective medications should be explored in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.