Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35246009›Full record

ArticleAssessment2023

Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores.

Marcus Mund, Marlies Maes, Pia M Drewke, Antonia Gutzeit, Isabel Jaki, Pamela Qualter

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Assessment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 92 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06441136 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Characterizing the Impact of Presbyphonia on Social Interaction

TypeinterventionalSponsorMatthew R. HoffmanRan2025 to 2026Enrolled25ConditionsPresbyphoniaArmsPhoRTE Program, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale, Social Disconnectedness Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire 9, Aging Voice Index
NCT07471529 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Activating Social Resources in Psychotherapy-Seeking Individuals: Effectiveness and Timing of a Social Support Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ZurichRan2026 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsLoneliness, Social Support, Depressive SymptomsArmsSocial Support Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcus MundUniversity of Klagenfurt, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0006-9043
Marlies MaesKU Leuven, Belgium.
Pia M DrewkeUniversity of Klagenfurt, Austria.
Antonia GutzeitFriedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Germany.
Isabel JakiFriedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Germany.
Pamela QualterThe University of Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several measures that assess loneliness have been developed for adults. Across three studies, we investigated psychometric features of scores of different versions of the Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale, the University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale, and three single-item measures. In Study 1 (

Indexed as

LonelinessPersonalityAdultHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaireslonelinessnomological netRasch-Type Loneliness Scaleself-other agreementsingle-item measuresUniversity of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scalevalidity

Identifiers

PMID35246009
PMCPMC10149889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.