Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35245756›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2022

The politics of mask-wearing: Political preferences, reactance, and conflict aversion during COVID.

Dannagal G Young, Huma Rasheed, Amy Bleakley, Jessica B Langbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ideological Consistency and News Sharing as Predictors of Masking Among College Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Public policy and conspiracies: The case of mandates.Current opinion in psychology · 2022
    Review
  19. Conservative Media Use and COVID-19 Related Behavior: The Moderating Role of Media Literacy Variables.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dannagal G YoungDepartments of Communication and Political Science, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA. Electronic address: dgyoung@udel.edu.
Huma RasheedDepartment of Communication, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Amy BleakleyDepartment of Communication, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Jessica B LangbaumBanner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG019610 · NIA · SUN HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GONZALEZ HERNANDEZ, GRACIELA · 2001 to 2020
$32.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG072980 · NIA · BANNER HEALTH · PI HEATHER Allyson BIMONTE-NELSON · 2021 to 2026
$24.9M
Establishing the science behind Alzheimer's recruitment registries: opportunities for increasing diversity and accelerating enrollment into trialsR01AG063954 · NIA · BANNER HEALTH · PI BLEAKLEY, AMY, LANGBAUM, JESSICA BROOKE · 2019 to 2023
$9.6M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG019610NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072980NIA NIH HHS R01 AG063954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current project examines how psychological reactance and conflict orientation relate to the highly politicized debate over mask-wearing in the U.S. during the COVID-19 pandemic. We explore how psychological reactance and conflict orientation are related to self-reported mask-wearing, and how these same predispositions are correlated with political beliefs. We then assess how favorability towards President Trump in the context of the 2020 Election was uniquely correlated with these traits and how Trump favorability both mediated and moderated the effects of conflict orientation and psychological reactance on individuals' likelihood of wearing masks. Results from a national survey of U.S. adults from Nov-Dec 2020 suggest that Trump favorability was positively associated with trait reactance, negatively associated with conflict aversion, and negatively associated with self-reported mask-wearing. The opposite was true of favorability towards Joe Biden. Moderation analyses indicate that conflict-approaching Biden detractors were especially unlikely to report wearing masks, while mediation analyses show that political preferences significantly mediated the relationships between both psychological traits and self-reported mask-wearing. Implications for the politicization of health messaging and health behavior are discussed.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdultHumansMasksPoliticsSARS-CoV-2Conflict aversionConflict orientationCoronavirusCOVID-19MaskingPoliticsPublic healthReactance

Identifiers

PMID35245756
PMCPMC8866197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.