Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35245336›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Prevalence and determinants of death registration and certification uptake in Uganda.

Leonard K Atuhaire, Elizabeth Nansubuga, Olivia Nankinga, Helen Namirembe Nviiri, Benard Odur

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Digital transformation of mortality reporting using an ICD-11 integrated death certificate system in Suriname.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Death registration coverage 2019-2021, India.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leonard K AtuhaireDepartment of Planning and Applied Statistics, School of Statistics and Planning, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-6166-093X
Elizabeth NansubugaDepartment of Population Studies, School of Statistics and Planning, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Olivia NankingaDepartment of Population Studies, School of Statistics and Planning, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Helen Namirembe NviiriDirectorate of Population and Social Statistics, Uganda Bureau of Statistics, Kampala, Uganda.
Benard OdurDepartment of Statistical Methods and Actuarial Science, School of Statistics and Planning, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Makerere University · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Death registration in Uganda remains extremely low, yet mortality statistics are vital in health policy, planning, resource allocation and decision-making. According to NIRA, only 1% of deaths are registered annually, while Uganda Bureau of Statistics estimates death registration at 24% for the period 2011-2016. The wide variation between the administrative and survey statistics can be attributed to the restriction to only certified death registration by NIRA while survey statistics relate to all forms of death notification and registration at the different sub-national levels. Registration of deaths is of critical importance to individuals and a country's government. Legally, it grants administrative rights in management of a deceased's estate, and access to social (insurance and pension) benefits of a deceased person. It is also essential for official statistics and planning purposes. There is an urgent need for continuous and real-time collection of mortality data or statistics in Uganda. These statistics are of significance in public health for identifying the magnitude and distribution of major disease problems, and are essential for the design, implementation, monitoring, and assessment of health programmes and policies. Lack of such continuous and timely data has negative consequences for the achievement of both national and Sustainable Development Goals 3, 11, 16, and 17. This study assessed the determinants of death registration and certification, using a survey of 2018-2019 deaths in 2,100 households across four administrative regions of Uganda and Kampala district. Multivariate-binary logistic regression was used to model factors associated with the likelihood of a death being registered or certified. We find that around one-third of deaths were registered while death certificates were obtained for less than 5% of the total deaths. Death registration and certification varied notably within Uganda. Uptake of death registration and certification was associated with knowledge on death registration, region, access to mass media, age of the deceased, place of death, occupation of the deceased, relationship to household head and request for death certificate. There is need for decentralization of death registration services; massive sensitization of communities and creating demand for death registration.

Indexed as

Biochemical PhenomenaCertificationDeath CertificatesFamily CharacteristicsHumansPrevalenceUganda

Identifiers

PMID35245336
PMCPMC8896680
OpenAlexW4214840020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.