Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35245302›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Vegetation and vertebrate abundance as drivers of bioturbation patterns along a climate gradient.

Diana Kraus, Roland Brandl, Sebastian Achilles, Jörg Bendix, Paulina Grigusova, Annegret Larsen, Patricio Pliscoff, Kirstin Übernickel, Nina Farwig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Diana KrausDepartment of Biology, Conservation Ecology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6243-4072
Roland BrandlDepartment of Biology, Animal Ecology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Sebastian AchillesDepartment of Geography, Laboratory for Climatology and Remote Sensing, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Jörg BendixDepartment of Geography, Laboratory for Climatology and Remote Sensing, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6559-2033
Paulina GrigusovaDepartment of Geography, Laboratory for Climatology and Remote Sensing, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Annegret LarsenDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Soil Geography and Landscape, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Patricio PliscoffDepartment of Ecology and Biodiversity and Institute of Geography, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Kirstin ÜbernickelDepartment of Geosciences, Earth System Dynamics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Nina FarwigDepartment of Biology, Conservation Ecology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioturbators shape their environment with considerable consequences for ecosystem processes. However, both the composition and the impact of bioturbator communities may change along climatic gradients. For burrowing animals, their abundance and composition depend on climatic and other abiotic components, with ants and mammals dominating in arid and semiarid areas, and earthworms in humid areas. Moreover, the activity of burrowing animals is often positively associated with vegetation cover (biotic component). These observations highlight the need to understand the relative contributions of abiotic and biotic components in bioturbation in order to predict soil-shaping processes along broad climatic gradients. In this study, we estimated the activity of animal bioturbation by counting the density of holes and the quantity of bioturbation based on the volume of soil excavated by bioturbators along a gradient ranging from arid to humid in Chile. We distinguished between invertebrates and vertebrates. Overall, hole density (no/ 100 m2) decreased from arid (raw mean and standard deviation for invertebrates: 14 ± 7.8, vertebrates: 2.8 ± 2.9) to humid (invertebrates: 2.8 ± 3.1, vertebrates: 2.2 ± 2.1) environments. However, excavated soil volume did not follow the same clear geographic trend and was 300-fold larger for vertebrates than for invertebrates. The relationship between bioturbating invertebrates and vegetation cover was consistently negative whereas for vertebrates both, positive and negative relationships were determined along the gradient. Our study demonstrates complex relationships between climate, vegetation and the contribution of bioturbating invertebrates and vertebrates, which will be reflected in their impact on ecosystem functions.

Indexed as

EcosystemInvertebratesAnimalsChileMammalsSoilVertebratesSoil

Identifiers

PMID35245302
PMCPMC8896722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.