Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35245157›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2022

Photovoice Revisited: Dialogue and Action as Pivotal.

Hanna Gabrielsson, Agneta Cronqvist, Eric Asaba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanna GabrielssonFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, 6233Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7813-3351
Agneta CronqvistDepartment of Health Care Sciences, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eric AsabaDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society (NVS), Division of Occupational Therapy, 163074Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6910-3468

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photovoice has gained acceptance as a viable visual method to engage community members as partners in research. However, as methods associated with photovoice have developed and evolved over time, concerns have also been raised with regard to how this impacts the methodological underpinnings on which photovoice rests. The aim of this article is to explore the meaning of dialogue and action as methodologically pivotal for the relevance of photovoice as community-based participatory research; further, using an empirical case and narrative theory, we attempt to contribute to an understanding of the processes that facilitate the viability and relevance of photovoice. By unpacking the contributions of dialogue and action towards a participatory methodology, in this case photovoice, the authors illustrate and argue for aspects critical in photovoice. Drawing on these aspects provides an arena for storytelling and story making, which have not previously had an explicit part in photovoice.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchPhotographyCommunicationHumansNarrationResearch Designdevelopmental disabilitydisabilitynarrative theoryphotovoice methodology

Identifiers

PMID35245157
PMCPMC9152598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.