Trial reportInvestigative and clinical urology2022
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by selective bladder preservation chemoradiotherapy in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of bladder.
Trial report in Investigative and clinical urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing clinical complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy Followed by Selective Bladder Preservation Chemoradiotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Post Hoc Analysis of Two Prospective Studies.Cancer research and treatment · 2024Trial
- Bladder-sparing chemoradiotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a retrospective cohort study.BMC urology · 2026Article
- An exploration of GuaLouQuMaiWan related novel prognostic model and search for potential compound pachymic acid in bladder cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Recent Advances and Future Directions in Bladder Preservation Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025Review
- Improving Urothelial Carcinoma Outcomes: The Powerful Combination of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in the Perioperative Period.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Identification of Molecular Subgroups of Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer and Their Impact on Treatment Outcome.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin Chemotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder.Cancer research and treatment · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by selective bladder preservation chemoradiotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with clinical T2-T4aN0M0 MIBC eligible for radical cystectomy and cisplatin-based chemotherapy were treated with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15, and cisplatin 70 mg/m² on day 1 every 28 days for 3 cycles. After clinical re-staging with computed tomography scans and cystoscopy, patients with clinical complete response (CR) were eligible to proceed without cystectomy and receive bladder preservation chemoradiotherapy involving weekly cisplatin 10 mg/m² and up to 70.2 Gy of radiation. The primary endpoint of the present prospective phase II study was metastasis-free survival (MFS).
resultsBetween Oct 2017 and Nov 2019, a total of 138 MIBC patients were enrolled and treated with neoadjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was well-tolerated, with fatigue, nausea, and pruritus being the most commonly observed adverse events. After completion of planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 54 patients with a clinical CR and 10 patients who did not have CR but refused surgery received bladder preservation chemoradiotherapy. With a median follow-up duration of 34 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 32%-36%), the 3-year MFS rate in 64 chemoradiotherapy patients was calculated to be 70% (95% CI, 58%-82%).
conclusionsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by selective bladder preservation chemoradiotherapy based on the clinical CR was feasible and efficacious in the treatment of MIBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.