Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35244990›Full record

Trial reportInvestigative and clinical urology2022

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by selective bladder preservation chemoradiotherapy in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of bladder.

Hyun Hwan Sung, Hana Kim, Ryul Kim, Chan Kyo Kim, Ghee Young Kwon, Won Park, Wan Song, Byong Chang Jeong, Se Hoon Park

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigative and clinical urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recent Advances and Future Directions in Bladder Preservation Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hyun Hwan Sung *Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9845-3742
Hana Kim *Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2374-5200
Ryul KimDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9461-3734
Chan Kyo KimDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Sciences, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0482-1140
Ghee Young KwonDepartment of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3304-577X
Won ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4686-2071
Wan SongDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0971-1805
Byong Chang JeongDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5399-2184
Se Hoon ParkDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hematoma@skku.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5084-9326
Samsung Medical Center · KRChangwon National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by selective bladder preservation chemoradiotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with clinical T2-T4aN0M0 MIBC eligible for radical cystectomy and cisplatin-based chemotherapy were treated with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15, and cisplatin 70 mg/m² on day 1 every 28 days for 3 cycles. After clinical re-staging with computed tomography scans and cystoscopy, patients with clinical complete response (CR) were eligible to proceed without cystectomy and receive bladder preservation chemoradiotherapy involving weekly cisplatin 10 mg/m² and up to 70.2 Gy of radiation. The primary endpoint of the present prospective phase II study was metastasis-free survival (MFS).

resultsBetween Oct 2017 and Nov 2019, a total of 138 MIBC patients were enrolled and treated with neoadjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was well-tolerated, with fatigue, nausea, and pruritus being the most commonly observed adverse events. After completion of planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 54 patients with a clinical CR and 10 patients who did not have CR but refused surgery received bladder preservation chemoradiotherapy. With a median follow-up duration of 34 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 32%-36%), the 3-year MFS rate in 64 chemoradiotherapy patients was calculated to be 70% (95% CI, 58%-82%).

conclusionsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by selective bladder preservation chemoradiotherapy based on the clinical CR was feasible and efficacious in the treatment of MIBC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellNeoadjuvant TherapyUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyCisplatinDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineHumansMaleMusclesProspective StudiesUrinary BladderCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabineBladder cancerConcurrent chemoradiotherapyNeoadjuvant chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35244990
PMCPMC8902424
OpenAlexW4212845336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.