Observational studyLa Tunisie medicale
Simulation Based Learning in internal medicine students.
Observational study in La Tunisie medicale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFew experiences have been reported in simulation-based learning (SBL) in internal medicine.
aimTo assess the SBL impact in internal medicine learning on learners' perception, knowledge acquisition, and cognitive and communication skills evaluation.
methodsA prospective observational study conducted in the Simulation Center at the Faculty of Medicine of Monastir between November 2018 and March 2019. High fidelity sessions were intended for lupus flare diagnosis and a standardized patient session for therapeutic education of patients on antivitamin K treatment.
resultsA total of 118 third-year undergraduate medical learners split into 9 groups attended 9 SBL sessions. Regarding learners' perception, gain in communication was felt among 117 learners (99.1%) and gain in confidence among 116 of them (98.3%). As for SBL impact on knowledge acquisition, the overall median pre and post-test scores were 5.76 / 10 (4.61-6.92) and 7.69 / 10 (6.92-9.23) respectively (p = 10-3). The median overall improvement score was 2.3(0.76-3.07). Assessing learners' skills made it possible to highlight certain learners' shortcomings which we focused on during debriefing.
conclusionAccording to the current study, SBL was associated with a high level of learners' satisfaction and was effective in optimizing knowledge and communication in lupus flare diagnosis and antivitamin K management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35244925PMC8734483W4287467201What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.