Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35244907›Full record

ArticleLa Tunisie medicale

Indications and results of exotropia surgical management.

Lamia ElFekih, Houda Lajmi, Achraf Ben Yakhlef

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in La Tunisie medicale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Postoperative outcome and influencing factors of strabismus surgery in infants aged 1-6 years.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lamia ElFekih
Houda Lajmi
Achraf Ben Yakhlef

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo study the clinical particularities and the surgical management of the different forms of exotropia, and to analyze the prognostic factors influencing the surgical result.

methodsMedical records of 132 patients who underwent exotropia surgery from 1995 to 2015, were retrospectively reviewed. Ophthalmological examination and a complete sensorimotor assessment were performed for each patient. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon.

resultsWe had 57 cases of intermittent exotropia (IE), 22 cases of infantile exotropia (IfE), 43 cases of sensory exotropia (SE) and 10 cases of concecutive exotropia (CE). The average age of onset of exotropia was 6.8 years +/- 8 SD. Amblyopia was noted in 36.4% of cases  of  IfE.  The mean deviation angle was  36.5  DP in (IE),  39.6  DP in (IfE)  and  44.5  DP  in  (SE). A vertical syndrome was frequently found in (IfE) patients. Bilateral recession of  lateral  rectus  was  the  most  performed  surgery  type.  The overall success rate after a  single  surgery  was  72%.  A multivariate logistic regression analysis  showed  that good prognosis  factors  were  the absence  of  amblyopia, the intermittent form of the strabismus,  a low  preoperative deviation angle and the ocular alignment on day one postoperatively.

conclusionsIE is the most common divergent strabismus.  Surgery resulted in successful alignment in most of the cases.  Early management and rigorous analysis of  patients sensorimotor status are the best guarantors of long-term success.

Indexed as

ExotropiaChildFollow-Up StudiesHumansOculomotor MusclesOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVision, Binocular

Identifiers

PMID35244907
PMCPMC8759321
OpenAlexW4287519790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.