Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35244892›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2022

Innovation in Orthopaedics: Part 2-How to Translate Ideas and Research into Clinical Practice.

Tiago Lazzaretti Fernandes, Rafaella Rogatto de Faria, Maria Alice Gonzales, Seth L Sherman, Sara Goldchmit, Andre Fleury

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Editorial: Tissue Engineering and Cell Therapy for Cartilage Restoration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tiago Lazzaretti FernandesSports Medicine Division, Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, 333 Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 05403-010, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil. tiago.lazzaretti@usp.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6665-3608
Rafaella Rogatto de FariaSports Medicine Division, Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, 333 Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 05403-010, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Maria Alice GonzalesDesign Department, School of Architecture and Urbanism, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Seth L ShermanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sara GoldchmitDesign Department, School of Architecture and Urbanism, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Andre FleuryProduction Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis paper presents some approaches and techniques for translating an idea or research into clinical practice, considering the innovation development process. RECENT

findingsInnovative tools have been a key solution for healthcare problems, such as musculoskeletal disorders, which represent a great economic burden and are among the leading causes of disability. There has been an increase in publications on this topic, but there has been no analysis of the process of innovation development. This review describes the innovation phases for translating an idea or research into clinical practice, considering the stages of discovering the opportunity, innovation creation, project specification, technology development, and innovation launch. An analysis of the innovation development process to translate an idea or research into clinical practice, including concepts, approaches, and techniques that shows the "why", "how", and "what" of innovation.

Indexed as

BiodesignClinical practiceCreativityDesign sprintDesign thinkingHealthcareInnovationOrthopaedicsUser experience

Identifiers

PMID35244892
PMCPMC9076759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.