Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35244888›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2022

Cancer Therapies and Vascular Toxicities.

Alexandra Meilhac, Jennifer Cautela, Franck Thuny

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra MeilhacDepartment of Cardiology, North Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Centre for CardioVascular and Nutrition Research (C2VN), University Mediterranean Center of Cardio-Oncology, Unit of Heart Failure and Valvular Heart Diseases, Inserm 1263, Inrae 1260, Aix-Marseille University, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France.
Jennifer CautelaDepartment of Cardiology, North Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Centre for CardioVascular and Nutrition Research (C2VN), University Mediterranean Center of Cardio-Oncology, Unit of Heart Failure and Valvular Heart Diseases, Inserm 1263, Inrae 1260, Aix-Marseille University, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France.
Franck ThunyDepartment of Cardiology, North Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Centre for CardioVascular and Nutrition Research (C2VN), University Mediterranean Center of Cardio-Oncology, Unit of Heart Failure and Valvular Heart Diseases, Inserm 1263, Inrae 1260, Aix-Marseille University, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France. franck.thuny@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8727-7154
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementVascular events have become an important issue in the overall management of cancer patients. They usually result from a combination of (i) direct or indirect toxicity of anticancer treatments, (ii) a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in cancer patients, and (iii) prolonged exposure to treatments due to an increasing patient survival rate. In addition to conventional chemotherapies and radiotherapy, targeted therapies and immunotherapies have been developed which improve the prognosis of cancer patients but sometimes at the cost of vascular toxicity, which can lead to systemic or pulmonary hypertension and arterial/venous thromboembolic events. Endothelial dysfunction, a procoagulant state and metabolic disorders are the three main pathophysiological patterns leading to cancer treatment-related vascular toxicity. This issue is challenging because serious vascular adverse events can necessitate cancer treatment being put on hold or stopped, which could compromise patient survival. In addition to increasing the risk of thrombotic adverse events, cancer therapies may lead to an increased risk of bleeding, especially in treatments with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. Therefore, we can define vasculo-oncology as a part of the cardio-oncology specialty; its aims are to predict, prevent, screen, and treat vascular toxicity related to cancer treatments. While the level of evidence is low regarding the management of vascular toxicity during cancer therapy, cardiologists and specialists in vascular diseases should closely collaborate with oncologists and hematologists to determine the optimal strategy for each patient.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyMedical OncologyVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAntineoplastic AgentsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ACancer therapeuticsCardio-oncologyVascular toxicity

Identifiers

PMID35244888
OpenAlexW4214919246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.