ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2022
Robotic-assisted abdominal aortic surgery: evidence and techniques.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic surgery in abdominal aortoiliac aneurysm and occlusive disease: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Aortic robotic surgery in Ireland: infrastructure without implementation - Is now the time to act?Irish journal of medical science · 2026Review
- Kurt-Semm-Center of minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgery: Over 10 years of an interdisciplinary and interprofessional project in clinical application, research and training.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Endoscopic Femoropopliteal Bypass Surgery Without Groin Incision: A Feasibility Study on Cadavers with the Da Vinci Single Port System.EJVES vascular forum · 2026Article
- Neurological complications post aortic arch surgery: a state of art review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
- Simulation-Based Training in Aortic Aneurysm Surgery: Toward a New Educational Standard.Cureus · 2025Review
- Feasibility study to evaluate the MMI Symani robotic system for microsurgical techniques in an in-vitro circulation model.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2025Article
- Robotically assisted outflow graft anastomosis in minimally invasive left-ventricular assist device implantation: feasibility, surgeon comfort, and operative times in an anatomical study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the MMI SymaniJournal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Radiologists' perceptions and readiness for integrating artificial intelligence in diagnostic imaging: A survey-based study.Bioinformation · 2024Article
- Patient satisfaction and quality of life outcomes following robotic-assisted surgery: A survey-based study.Bioinformation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In various disciplines, robotic-assisted surgery is a well-proven routine procedure, but have never been established in vascular surgery so far. This review summarizes the results to date of robotic-assisted abdominal aortic surgery (RAAS) in the treatment of aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Web-based literature search of robotic-assisted surgical procedures on the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries between 1990 and 2020 including the Cochrane Library, OVID Medline, Embase, and PubMed medical databases. All studies conducting Robotic-assisted surgery were included in the quantitative analysis regarding operative and cross-clamping times, conversion rates, mortality and morbidity within the first 30 days, and in-hospital stay. Case reports and case studies (< 5 patients) were not included. Twenty-four studies were deemed thematically eligible for inclusion; after exclusion of duplicate publications, nine met the inclusion criteria for further analysis. A total of 850 patients who had either abdominal aortic aneurysm or aorto-iliac occlusive disease underwent RAAS. One study of abdominal aortic aneurysm, three of aorto-iliac occlusive disease, and five studies of both disease entities were analyzed quantitatively. For AAA, conversion rates ranged from 13.1 to 20% and perioperative mortality ranged from 0 to 1.6% with in-hospital stay of 7 days. For aorto-iliac occlusive disease, conversion rates ranged from 0 to 20%, and perioperative mortality ranged from 0 to 3.6% with in-hospital stay of 5-8 days. RAAS has been shown to be technically feasible with acceptable short-term outcomes and questionable benefits in terms of in-hospital stay and complication rates. RAAS is currently considered only an outsider procedure. Randomized-controlled trials are indispensable for regular use in vascular surgery as well as a clear approval situation for the vascular sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.