Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35244823›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2022

Challenges and opportunities for using population health data to investigate cancer survivors' quality of life in Australia.

Imogen Ramsey, Nadia Corsini, Amanda Hutchinson, Julie Marker, Marion Eckert

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Introduction to the special section "Reducing research waste in (health-related) quality of life research".Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Imogen RamseyRosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, Australia. imogen.ramsey@unisa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8757-1572
Nadia CorsiniRosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Amanda HutchinsonUniSA Justice & Society, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Julie MarkerCancer Voices South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Marion EckertRosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
University of South Australia · AUCancer Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a recognised need for reported national data that inform health policy, health professions, and consumers about the wellbeing of Australians with cancer and other chronic conditions. International initiatives have demonstrated the viability and benefits of utilising population-based cancer registries to monitor the prevalence and trajectory of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes among people with cancer. Establishing a similar level of monitoring in Australia would require timely access to health data collected by publicly funded, population-based cancer registries, and the capacity to link this information across jurisdictions. Combining information from different sources via data linkage is an efficient and cost-effective way to maximise how data are used to inform population health and policy development. However, linking health datasets has historically been highly restricted, resource-intensive, and costly in Australia due to complex and outdated legislative requirements, duplicative approval processes, and differing policy frameworks in each state and territory. This has resulted in significant research waste due to underutilisation of existing data, duplication of research efforts and resources, and data not being translated into decision-making. Recognising these challenges, from 2015 to 2017 the Productivity Commission investigated options for improving data availability and use in Australia, considering factors such as privacy, security, and intellectual property. The inquiry report recommended significant reforms for Australian legislation, including the creation of a data sharing and release structure to improve access to data for research and policy development purposes. This paper discusses (1) opportunities in HRQOL research enabled by data linkage, (2) barriers to data access and use in Australia and the implications for waste in HRQOL research, and (3) proposed legislative reforms for improving data availability and use in Australia.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsPopulation HealthAustraliaHealth PolicyHumansQuality of LifeCancerPopulation healthQuality of lifeSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID35244823
PMCPMC9470682
OpenAlexW4214897745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.