Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35244791›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2022

Is there a diagnostic benefit of late-phase abdomino-pelvic PET/CT after urination as part of whole-body

Janna Morawitz, Julian Kirchner, Johannes Hertelendy, Christina Loberg, Lars Schimmöller, Mardjan Dabir, Lena Häberle, Eduards Mamlins, Christina Antke, Christian Arsov and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biphasic contrast-enhanced [EJNMMI research · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of [EJNMMI research · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janna MorawitzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Julian KirchnerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. julian.kirchner@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8224-3433
Johannes HertelendyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christina LobergDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Lars SchimmöllerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Mardjan DabirDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Lena HäberleInstitute of Pathology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Eduards MamlinsDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christina AntkeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christian ArsovDepartment of Urology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Gerald AntochDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Lino M SawickiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess the diagnostic value of an additional late-phase PET/CT scan after urination as part of

methodsThis retrospective trial included patients with BCR following radical prostatectomy, who underwent standard whole-body early-phase PET/CT performed 105 ± 45 min and an additional late-phase PET/CT performed 159 ± 13 min after injection of

resultsWhole-body early-phase PET/CT detected 93 prostate cancer lesions in 33 patients. Late-phase PET/CT detected two additional lesions in two patients, both local recurrences. In total, there were 57 nodal, 28 bone, and 3 lung metastases, and 7 local recurrences. Between early- and late-phase PET/CT, lymph node metastases showed a significant increase of SUVmax from 14.5 ± 11.6 to 21.5 ± 17.6 (p = 0.00007), translating to a factor of + 1.6. Benign lymph nodes in the respective regions showed a significantly lower increase of SUVmax of 1.4 ± 0.5 to 1.7 ± 0.5 (p = 0.0014, factor of + 1.2). Local recurrences and bone metastases had a SUVmax on late-phase PET/CT that was + 1.7 and + 1.1 times higher than the SUVmax on early-phase PET/CT, respectively.

conclusionIn patients with BCR following radical prostatectomy, an additional abdomino-pelvic late-phase

Indexed as

Biochemical recurrenceLesion detectionPET/CTProstate cancerPSMA

Identifiers

PMID35244791
PMCPMC8897520
OpenAlexW4214884630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.