Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35244734›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis-a surgical emergency or elective in the next day's program?]

Carsten Gutt, Simon Schläfer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carsten GuttKlinik für Allgemein,- Viszeral,- Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum Memmingen, Bismarckstraße 23, 87700, Memmingen, Deutschland. carsten.gutt@klinikum-memmingen.de.
Simon SchläferKlinik für Allgemein,- Viszeral,- Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum Memmingen, Bismarckstraße 23, 87700, Memmingen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment of acute cholecystitis is based on the German S3 guidelines on "Prophylaxis, diagnosis and treatment of gallstones", which was updated in 2018. If the patient has no contraindications for surgery, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice.

objectiveCurrent meta-analyses and studies confirm that for most patients the optimal period of time for surgical treatment is the first 24 h after hospitalization; however, there is an ongoing controversial discussion on how strictly the 24 h rule should be adhered to and under which circumstances it may be valid to deviate from it. MATERIAL AND

methodA systematic analysis of the current literature and a clinical evaluation were carried out.

resultsFor the diagnosis of an acute cholecystitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be carried out within the first 24 h after hospitalization regardless of the age and comorbidities of the patient as well as the severity of inflammation. If there is no special emergency situation, under certain circumstances surgery can be performed in the next day's program. DISCUSSION: This recommendation for early surgery for high-risk patients has so far been controversially discussed; however, current studies confirm that the advantages of early surgery outweigh the disadvantages also for this group of patients. The surgical risk should be individually assessed and be included in the treatment decision.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholecystitisCholecystitis, AcuteGallstonesCholecystectomyHumansHigh-risk patientLaparoscopyStage gradingSymptom onsetTreatment duration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.