Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35244701›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy.

Bobby Daly, Kevin Nicholas, Jessica Flynn, Nicholas Silva, Katherine Panageas, Jun J Mao, Lior Gazit, Dmitriy Gorenshteyn, Stefania Sokolowski, Tiffanny Newman and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effectiveness of ePRO-based symptom management for cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Effects of nurse-led symptom management in chronic myeloid malignancies: a randomized trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Effects of a Geriatric Assessment Intervention on Patient-Reported Symptomatic Toxicity in Older Adults With Advanced Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Step count and symptom severity during cancer treatment using the Symptom Care at Home digital platform.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  15. Adherence to daily electronic symptom screening in pediatric cancer: associations with time, location and pain.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Bobby DalyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Kevin NicholasMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jessica FlynnMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Nicholas SilvaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Katherine PanageasMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jun J MaoMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Lior GazitMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Dmitriy GorenshteynMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Stefania SokolowskiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Tiffanny NewmanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Claire PerryMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Isaac WagnerMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Alice ZervoudakisMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Rori SalvaggioMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jessie HollandMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Yeneat O ChiuMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Gilad J KupermanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Brett A SimonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Diane L Reidy-LagunesMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Wendy PerchickMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceElectronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) may have the potential to improve cancer care delivery by enhancing patient quality of life, reducing acute care visits, and extending overall survival. However, the optimal cadence of ePRO assessments is unknown.

objectiveTo determine patient response preferences and the clinical value associated with a daily cadence for ePROs for patients receiving antineoplastic treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis quality improvement study of adult patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment assessed a remote monitoring program using ePROs that was developed to manage cancer therapy-related symptoms. ePRO data submitted between October 16, 2018 to February 29, 2020, from a single regional site within the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center network were included. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to January 2022. EXPOSURE: While undergoing active treatment, patients received a daily ePRO assessment that, based on patient responses, generated yellow (moderate) or red (severe) symptom alerts that were sent to clinicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcomes assessed included patient response rate, symptom alert frequency, and an analysis of the clinical value of daily ePROs.

resultsA total of 217 patients (median [range] age, 66 [31-92] years; 103 [47.5%] women and 114 [52.5%] men) initiating antineoplastic therapy at high risk for symptoms were monitored for a median (range) of 91 (2-369) days. Most patients had thoracic (59 patients [27.2%]), head and neck (48 patients [22.1%]), or gastrointestinal (43 patients [19.8%]) malignant neoplasms. Of 14 603 unique symptom assessments completed, 7349 (50.3%) generated red or yellow symptom alerts. Symptoms commonly generating alerts included pain (665 assessments [23.0%]) and functional status (465 assessments [16.1%]). Most assessments (8438 assessments [57.8%]) were completed at home during regular clinic hours (ie, 9 am-5 pm), with higher response rates on weekdays (58.4%; 95% CI, 57.5%-59.5%) than on weekend days (51.3%; 95% CI, 49.5%-53.1%). Importantly, 284 of 630 unique red alerts (45.1%) surfaced without a prior yellow alert for the same symptom within the prior 7 days; symptom severity fluctuated over the course of a week, and symptom assessments generating a red alert were followed by an acute care visit within 7 days 8.7% of the time compared with 2.9% for assessments without a red alert. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that daily ePRO assessments were associated with increased insight into symptom management in patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment and symptom alerts were associated with risk of acute care.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeSymptom AssessmentAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID35244701
PMCPMC8897754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.