ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2022
Custom multi‑tumor next‑generation sequencing panel for routine molecular diagnosis of solid tumors: Validation and results from three‑year clinical use.
Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pilot Study by Liquid Biopsy in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular testing is extremely important in cancer care, starting as early as at diagnosis. In order to address the challenge of providing reliable results within the timeframe adapted to patient management and suitable to guide clinical decisions, a capture‑based next‑generation sequencing (NGS) panel focusing on ten genes known to harbor genetic variations which may be targeted by approved drugs in patients with cancer was designed and validated. Very favorable analytical performances were obtained for both solid and liquid biopsies. For solid biopsies, a low read depth (80X per nucleotide) led to the genotype detection accuracy of 100%. The read of raw data for liquid biopsies resulted in the 91.19% result concordance between paired solid and liquid samples. The present method met all the requirements for the ISO15189 certification. During our three‑year experience of routinely using this panel, almost 2,300 samples from lung and colorectal cancers, melanomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors have been analyzed. It was found that our panel detected slightly more gain‑of‑function variants than described in the literature. Surprisingly, loss‑of‑function variants were also detected in certain of the analyzed genes. Finally, liquid biopsy data revealed statistically different mutated allele frequencies between tumor types, but also between mutated genes and variants themselves. In conclusion, the use of our capture‑based NGS panel is perfectly adapted to perform relevant molecular diagnosis in a time frame compatible with patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.