Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35244167›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2022

Seeing Picasso: an investigation into the visual system of the triggerfish Rhinecanthus aculeatus.

Karen L Cheney, Jemma Hudson, Fanny de Busserolles, Martin Luehrmann, Abigail Shaughnessy, Cedric van den Berg, Naomi F Green, N Justin Marshall, Fabio Cortesi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen L CheneySchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5622-9494
Jemma HudsonSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Fanny de BusserollesQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4602-9840
Martin LuehrmannQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4060-4592
Abigail ShaughnessySchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9330-0093
Cedric van den BergSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6422-7237
Naomi F GreenSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5199-7857
N Justin MarshallQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9006-6713
Fabio CortesiQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7518-6159
The University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council FT190100313The University of Queensland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision is used by animals to find food and mates, avoid predators, defend resources and navigate through complex habitats. Behavioural experiments are essential for understanding animals' perception but are often challenging and time-consuming; therefore, using species that can be trained easily for complex tasks is advantageous. Picasso triggerfish, Rhinecanthus aculeatus, have been used in many behavioural studies investigating vision and navigation. However, little is known about the molecular and anatomical basis of their visual system. We addressed this knowledge gap here and behaviourally tested achromatic and chromatic acuity. In terms of visual opsins, R. aculeatus possessed one rod opsin gene (RH1) and at least nine cone opsins: one violet-sensitive SWS2B gene, seven duplicates of the blue-green-sensitive RH2 gene (RH2A, RH2B, RH2C1-5) and one red-sensitive LWS gene. However, only five cone opsins were expressed: SWS2B expression was consistent, while RH2A, RH2C-1 and RH2C-2 expression varied depending on whether fish were sampled from the field or aquaria. Levels of LWS expression were very low. Using fluorescence in situ hybridisation, we found SWS2B was expressed exclusively in single cones, whereas RH2A and RH2Cs were expressed in opposite double cone members. Anatomical resolution estimated from ganglion cell densities was 6.8 cycles per degree (cpd), which was significantly higher than values obtained from behavioural testing for black-and-white achromatic stimuli (3.9 cpd) and chromatic stimuli (1.7-1.8 cpd). These measures were twice as high as previously reported. This detailed information on their visual system will help inform future studies with this emerging focal species.

Indexed as

Cone OpsinsTetraodontiformesAnimalsOpsinsPhylogenyRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRod OpsinsCone OpsinsOpsinsRod OpsinsBehaviourColour visionGene expressionOpsinRetinal topographyVisual acuityVisual pigment

Identifiers

PMID35244167
PMCPMC9080752
OpenAlexW4214827475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.