Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35244070›Full record

ArticleMedicine2022

A comparative study of a nerve block therapy with and without a deeply inserted acupotomy applied to hyeopcheok points for lumbosacral radiculopathy: Safety, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness (a randomized controlled, two-arm, parallel study, pilot study, assessor-blind).

Sooil Choi, Sukhee Park, Young-Soo Lim, Tae-Yong Park, Kwang-Sun Do, Sang Hyun Byun, Sang-Hoon Yoon, Jin-Hyun Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sooil ChoiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University, International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, South Korea.
Sukhee ParkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University, International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, South Korea.
Young-Soo LimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University, International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, South Korea.
Tae-Yong ParkInstitute for Integrative Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, South Korea.
Kwang-Sun DoInstitute for Integrative Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, South Korea.
Sang Hyun ByunS-HEAL Pain and Korean Medicine Clinic, Seoul, South Korea.
Sang-Hoon YoonDepartment of Applied Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.
Jin-Hyun LeeInstitute for Integrative Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8387-2485
Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital · KRDunsan Korean Medicine Hospital · KRKyung Hee University · KR

Funding

PROVIDE RABBITS, RATS MICE, HAMSTERS GERBILS, GUINEA PIGS27307C0012 · NIEHS · PI BOLEN, WAYNE · 2007 to 2007
$1.0M
Ministry of Health and Welfare HF20C0012NIEHS NIH HHS 27307C0012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe prevalence of lumbosacral radiculopathy is estimated to be approximately 3% to 5% in patient populations. Lumbosacral radiculopathy is largely caused by a complex interaction between biomechanical and biochemical factors. Nerve block therapy (NBT) mainly treats lumbosacral radiculopathy by improving the biochemical factors, whereas acupotomy mainly focuses on improving the biomechanical factors. Therefore, it is thought that synergistic effects may be obtained for the treatment of lumbosacral radiculopathy when both NBT and acupotomy are combined. However, no study in China and Korea, where acupotomy is majorly provided, has reported the effects of such a combination treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of the concurrent use of a deeply inserted acupotomy and NBT for the treatment of lumbosacral radiculopathy. METHODS/

designThis is an open-label, parallel, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial, which will include 50 patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy. After patients voluntarily agree to participate in the study, they will be screened, and will undergo necessary examinations and tests according to the protocol. Those who satisfy the selection criteria will be randomly assigned to either the NBT + acupotomy or NBT groups in a 1:1 ratio. Both groups will undergo 2 NBTs once every 2 weeks from 1 week after the screening test. The treatment group will receive additional acupotomy twice a week for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint is the Oswestry Disability Index, whereas the secondary endpoints are the Numeral Rating Scale, European Quality of Life 5-dimension, McGill pain Questionnaire, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, safety assessment, and economic feasibility evaluation. The measurements will be made at 0, 2, 4, and 8 weeks. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has received complete ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital (IS20OISE0085). We intend to submit the results of the trial to a peer-reviewed journal and/or conferences.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyNerve BlockCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeRadiculopathyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35244070
PMCPMC8896499
OpenAlexW4214906351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.