Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35243831›Full record

ReviewSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2022

[Recent advances in isolation and detection of circulating tumor cells with a microfluidic system].

Rongkai Cao, Min Zhang, Hao Yu, Jianhua Qin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rongkai CaoDalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Min ZhangDalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Hao YuDalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Jianhua QinDalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The isolation and analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is an important issue in tumor research. CTCs in peripheral blood, which are important biomarkers of liquid biopsy, are closely related to the occurrence of cancer and are used to monitor the effect of treatment on cancer patients. However, the number of CTCs in the blood samples of cancer patients is very low, usually being present at only 0-10 CTCs/mL. Therefore, prior to the detection of CTCs, it is important to preprocess clinical blood samples for efficient separation and enrichment. With the advantages of low sample consumption, high separation efficiency, ease of automation and integration, microfluidic chips can be a suitable platform for the isolation of CTCs. In the last few years, CTC separation and detection using microfluidic chips have developed rapidly, and a variety of detection methods have been developed. According to the technical principle used, microfluidics for CTC separation can be divided into biological property-based methods and physical property-based methods. The biological property-based methods mainly depend on the interaction between the antigen and antibody, or the specific binding of the aptamer and target. These methods have high selectivity but low efficiency and recovery rates. Physical separation is based on the physical properties of CTCs such as their size, density, and dielectric properties. For example, CTCs can be blocked or captured by the microstructure in the channels of microfluidic chips, sorted by external physical fields (acoustic, electrical, magnetic), or screened by micro-scale hydrodynamics. Physical property-based methods generally have a higher flux but lower separation purity. However, the advantages of biological property-based methods and physical property-based methods can be integrated to provide microfluidic chips having better separation performance. In addition to the direct positive enrichment of CTCs, a negative enrichment strategy can also be adopted. The influence of direct screening on the activity of CTCs can be avoided by selectively removing white blood cells. In this paper, recent advances in microfluidics utilized in the isolation of CTCs, including physical and immune methods and positive and negative enrichment, are reviewed. We summarized the technical principles, detection methods, and research progress in CTC separation and detection using microfluidic chips. Developing trends in microfluidics for CTC separation and analysis are also discussed.

Indexed as

Microfluidic Analytical TechniquesNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingCell Line, TumorCell SeparationHumansMicrofluidicscirculating tumor cells (CTCs)microfluidicsseparation and detection

Identifiers

PMID35243831
PMCPMC9404083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.