ReviewZoonoses and public health2022
Identifying scenarios and risk factors for Q fever outbreaks using qualitative analysis of expert opinion.
Review in Zoonoses and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Direct whole-genome sequencing of Coxiella burnetii from environmental samples using a two-step selective enrichment approach.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Benchmarking Q fever transmission in czech republic and serbia: A one health sub-national population study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Q Fever: Who Is at Risk? A Serological Survey in the General Population and Occupationally Exposed Individuals in Northern Italy.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Metabarcoding analysis of the microbiota in flocks naturally infected byOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Assessing Q Fever Exposure in Veterinary Professionals: A Study on Seroprevalence and Awareness in Portugal, 2024.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Q Fever-Related Community Infections: United States Exposure toPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Diagnosing and Preventing Q Fever in Regional New South Wales, Australia-A Qualitative Exploration of Perspectives of General Practitioners.The Australian journal of rural health · 2025Article
- National serosurvey and risk mapping reveal widespread distribution of Coxiella burnetii in Kenya.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis caused by Coxiella Burnetii: A case report.Medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring patient experiences of illness and diagnostic pathways in self-reported Q fever cases.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Risk factors influencing Coxiella burnetii seropositivity in water Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) populations of Egypt's Nile Delta.PloS one · 2025Article
- Detection and seroprevalence of Q fever infection in dairy goats in Besut district, Malaysia.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2024Article
- A systematic review of global Q fever outbreaks.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Review
- Identifying scenarios and risk factors for Q fever outbreaks using qualitative analysis of expert opinion.Zoonoses and public health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Q fever is an important zoonotic disease perceived to be an occupational hazard for those working with livestock. Outbreaks involving large numbers of people are uncommon, but the increasing case incidence coupled with changing environmental and industry conditions that promote transmission of Q fever has raised concerns that large and serious outbreaks could become more frequent. The aim of this study was to use expert opinion to better understand how large Q fever outbreaks might occur in an Australian context and to document factors believed to be drivers of disease transmission. Focus groups were conducted with human and animal health professionals across several Australian states. All discussions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and imported into NVIVO for thematic analysis. Four anthropogenic risk factors (disease awareness, industry practices, land use, human behaviour) and three ecological risk factors (physical environment, agent dissemination, animal hosts) emerged from the data. Analysis of expert opinions pointed to the existence of numerous scenarios in which Q fever outbreaks could occur, many of which depict acquisition in the wider community outside of traditional at-risk occupations. This perception of the expansion of Q fever from occupational-acquisition to community-acquisition is driven by greater overarching economic, political and socio-cultural influences that govern the way in which people live and work. Findings from this study highlight that outbreaks are complex phenomena that involve the convergence of diverse elements, not just that of the pathogen and host, but also the physical, political and socioeconomic environments in which they interact. A review of the approaches to prevent and manage Q fever outbreaks will require a multisectorial approach and strengthening of community education, communication and engagement so that all stakeholders become an integrated part of outbreak mitigation and response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.