Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35243628›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2022

Linking health education, civic engagement, and research at a large Federally Qualified Health Center to address health disparities.

Melissa Chinchilla, Gloria Itzel Montiel, Monica Perez Jolles, Matthew Charles Lomeli, Carolyn F Wong, Anne Laure Escaron, Evelyn González-Figueroa, Joanna Garcia, Aisli Briceida Valencia, Mika Kadono and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Translating research into policy and action.Health services research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Melissa ChinchillaAltaMed Institute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7546-0827
Gloria Itzel MontielAltaMed Institute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Monica Perez JollesSuzanne Dworak Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7855-456X
Matthew Charles LomeliTelehealth, Patient Access, & Patient Services, AltaMed Health Services, Anaheim, California, USA.
Carolyn F WongDivision of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Anne Laure EscaronAltaMed Institute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Evelyn González-FigueroaCultural & Linguistic Competency, AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Joanna GarciaAltaMed Institute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Aisli Briceida ValenciaAltaMed Institute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Mika KadonoAltaMed Institute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Arturo AcostaClinical Services, AltaMed Health Services, Huntington Beach, California, USA.
Corina MartinezAltaMed Institute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ana Laura HerreraResearch, Strategic Prevention Solutions, Oakland, California, USA.
Rajan Anthony SonikAltaMed Institute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a framework for patient-centered research in a community health center. STUDY

settingPrimary organizational case-study data were collected at a large Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in Southern California from 2019 to 2021. STUDY

designThirty stakeholders, including patients, community leaders, students, medical providers, and academic partners, participated in community-engagement capacity-building exercises and planning. These activities were guided by Community Based Participatory Principles and were part of an initiative to address health disparities by supporting patient and community-engaged research. DATA COLLECTION: The study included an iterative development process. Stakeholders participated in a total of 44 workgroup meetings and 7 full-group quarterly convenings. The minutes of the meetings from both workgroups and quarterly convenings were used to document the evolution of the initiative. PRINCIPLE

findingsStakeholders concluded that health equity research needs to be part of a larger engagement ecosystem and that, in some ways, engagement on research projects may be a later-stage form of engagement following patient/community and staff/researcher coeducation and cocapacity building efforts.

conclusionsCommunity health center stakeholders viewed successful engagement of community members in patient-centered health equity research as involving a web of longitudinal, evolving internal and external relationships rather than discrete, time-limited, and single-project-based dyadic connections.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchHealth EquityCapacity BuildingEcosystemHealth EducationHumanscommunity medicinefederally qualified health centershealth disparitieshealth equityLatinxparticipatory researchSocial Determinants of Health

Identifiers

PMID35243628
PMCPMC9108223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.