Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35243621›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2022

From patient outcomes to system change: Evaluating the impact of VHA's implementation of the Whole Health System of Care.

Barbara G Bokhour, Justeen Hyde, Benjamin Kligler, Hannah Gelman, Lauren Gaj, Anna M Barker, Jamie Douglas, Rian DeFaccio, Stephanie L Taylor, Steven B Zeliadt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patient and Support Person Satisfaction Following a Whole Health-Informed Interdisciplinary Pain Team Meeting.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2024
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara G BokhourCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8238-0745
Justeen HydeCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA.
Benjamin KliglerOffice of Patient Centered Care & Cultural Transformation, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Hannah GelmanCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Lauren GajCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2128-2890
Anna M BarkerCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA.
Jamie DouglasCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Rian DeFaccioCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Stephanie L TaylorCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Steven B ZeliadtCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
VA Puget Sound Health Care System · USVA New England Healthcare System · USBoston University · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USWashington State Department of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe how a partnered evaluation of the Whole Health (WH) system of care-comprised of the WH pathway, clinical care, and well-being programs-produced patient outcomes findings, which informed Veterans Health Administration (VA) policy and system change. DATA SOURCES: Electronic health records (EHR)-based cohort of 1,368,413 patients and a longitudinal survey of Veterans receiving care at 18 WH pilot medical centers. STUDY

designIn partnership with VA operations, we focused the evaluation on the impact of WH services utilization on Veterans' (1) use of opioids and (2) care experiences, care engagement, and well-being. Outcomes were compared between Veterans who did and did not use WH services identified from the EHR. DATA COLLECTION: Pharmacy records and WH service data were obtained from the VA EHR, including WH coaching, peer-led groups, personal health planning, and complementary, integrative health therapies. We surveyed veterans at baseline and 6 months to measure patient-reported outcomes. PRINCIPAL

findingsOpioid use decreased 23% (31.5-6.5) to 38% (60.3-14.4) among WH users depending on level of WH use compared to a secular 11% (12.0-9.9) decrease among Veterans using Conventional Care. Compared to Conventional Care users, WH users reported greater improvements in perceptions of care (SMD = 0.138), engagement in health care (SMD = 0.118) and self-care (SMD = 0.1), life meaning and purpose (SMD = 0.152), pain (SMD = 0.025), and perceived stress (SMD = 0.191).

conclusionsEvidence developed through this partnership yielded key VA policy changes to increase Veteran access to WH services. Findings formed the foundation of a congressionally mandated report in response to the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act, highlighting the value of WH and complementary, integrative health and well-being programs for Veterans with pain. Findings subsequently informed issuance of an Executive Decision Memo mandating the integration of WH into mental health and primary care across VA, now one lane of modernization for VA.

Indexed as

United States Department of Veterans AffairsVeteransHumansPainPatient Acceptance of Health CareUnited StatesVeterans Health*evaluation design and researchhealth care organizations and systemshealth policy/politics/law/regulationpatient assessment/satisfactionVA health care system

Identifiers

PMID35243621
PMCPMC9108226
OpenAlexW4214941481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.